DETERMINING THE ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT OF SHRIMP AQUACULTURE THROUGH LIFE CYCLE ANALYSIS OF OUTDOOR POND SYSTEMS Mitigating Negative Environmental Impacts / Study / 07 MNE 05 UM
Ling Cao
2012-01-01
Abstract:A life cycle assessment (LCA) was applied to evaluate the environmental impacts and identify sustainability issues of three different farming scenarios based on case studies on Hainan Island, China. These scenarios were: (1) intensive farming for an overseas export market, using larvae produced by imported specific pathogen free (SPF) broodstock; (2) semiintensive farming for export to the mainland using larvae produced by imported SPF broodstock; and (3) semi-intensive farming for local consumption using larvae produced by local broodstock. Environmental impact categories used in this study were based on the Ecoindicator 95 method from SimaPro software and included global warming potential, ozone layer depletion, acidification, eutrophication, heavy metals, carcinogens, summer smog, winter smog, energy use, and solid waste. The life cycle stages were hatchery, outdoor farming, post-farming, consumption, and transportation. Data were collected from farms on Hainan Island during the summer of 2008. The main differences among the three scenarios were related to energy use, global warming, and eutrophication potential. Scenario 1 showed the highest environmental impacts for almost all impact categories. The outdoor farming stage was the key stage contributing the most significant impacts, and it accounted for 50-77% of total impacts. These impacts were mainly caused by feed use, electricity use and wastewater discharge. To produce 1 kg of shrimp in China for either export or self consumption, 78-97 MJ of energy was needed, generating 5.77.7 kg of CO2 and 0.11-0.19 kg of PO4. Improvements suggested for Chinese shrimp aquaculture include changes in feed concentrations and electricity generating portfolios, as well as wastewater treatment before discharge. Local or national consumption would reduce total environmental impacts by 26-29%. INTRODUCTION Aquaculture is of great importance worldwide, serving as an alternative source to traditional food production systems and helping accommodate the expansion of human populations. Global production of farmed shrimp increased from less than 9000 tons in 1970 to more than 1.6 million tons in 2003 (FAO, 2005). Over 50 countries produce significant amounts of farmed shrimp today. Asia plays the leading role in shrimp farming, accounting for almost 80% of world shrimp TECHNICAL REPORTS: INVESTIGATIONS 2007-2009 471 culture, particularly from China and Thailand (Fuchs et al., 1999). China is currently the world’s largest producer and second largest exporter of farmed shrimp after Thailand (Munkung, 2005). The increase in farmed shrimp production was achieved by intensification of farming systems, often characterized by increased material inputs, energy demands, and effluent discharge (Prein, 2007). The expansion of shrimp farming has generated global concerns over its negative environmental impacts on the environment, aquatic ecosystems and human lives in coastal areas (Diana, 2009). These impacts include use of fishmeal in feed, abuse of chemicals, and modification of land (Clay, 1997; Boyd and Clay, 1998). Intensive shrimp farming systems have been criticized for high fishmeal and energy consumption, while traditional systems have been criticized for low land conversion efficiency (Bartley et al., 2007). Growing awareness of environmental problems during recent years has led to increasing demand for environmental performance information for different shrimp production systems. Shrimp aquaculture is a complex food production system, comprising many different stages including hatchery, grow-out, and post-farming conducted under a wide range of social, economic, and environmental conditions. The main species cultured in China is the white leg shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) because it has high economic value, SPF broodstock with low disease potential, and is relatively easy to culture, with a short growth period of three to four months to reach marketable size. There are two common types of hatcheries in southern China. One is characterized by high investment and technology, large-scale, and the use of imported specific pathogen-free (SPF) broodstock from U.S. This type of hatchery uses high densities and high rates of water exchange, and can produce post-larvae throughout the year. High survival rates of post-larvae, up to 60%, are common in these hatcheries. These SPF post-larvae are characterized by rapid growth and disease resistance. The other type of hatchery is typically a small-scale facility characterized by low investment and technology that uses locally grown broodstock. The survival rate of postlarvae is usually 40% or less in such facilities. Grow-out farms usually buy post-larvae from hatcheries and produce marketable shrimp within three to five months. Chinese shrimp farms are widely distributed along the 18,400 km coastline from Hainan Province in the tropics to Liaoning Province in the temperate zone (Xie and Yu, 2007). Farmers usually culture two to three crops of shrimp per year in southern China, while farmers in northern part can harvest only one crop. There are currently about 14,000 shrimp farms in China, with extensive farms constituting 5% (by number), semi-intensive 85%, and intensive farms 10%. These categories are characterized by the stocking density, use of capital, equipment, labor, skill, land, water, feed, and energy (Xie and Yu, 2007). Extensive shrimp farming (low stocking density and low water exchange rate) is conducted in near-shore communities along the coast, especially in tidal and mangrove areas (Munkung, 2005). Semiintensive and intensive farms are usually conducted above the high tide line. They use pumped water exchange, and combine fertilizers and commercial formulated feed with a higher stocking density and higher water exchange rate. After harvest, fresh shrimp are usually sold directly to local wholesalers or processing plants for further processing. Local wholesalers distribute fresh shrimp to retailers and sell them in local markets. Depending on market requirements, processed shrimp are sold nationwide or exported overseas to Japan and the U.S. in the following forms: head-on shell-on shrimp, headless shell-on shrimp, peeled tail-on shrimp, peeled and deveined shrimp, and peeled and un-deveined shrimp. TECHNICAL REPORTS: INVESTIGATIONS 2007-2009 472 Evaluating system efficiency for shrimp aquaculture requires a fair comparison of environmental impacts among different production systems. Life cycle assessment (LCA) can be used to make such a comparison, quantifying potential environmental burdens throughout the whole life cycle of shrimp production. An LCA analyzes the whole production and supply chain. It allows one to calculate the relative energy intensity and material usage in an overall process or in various components of that process (Diana, 2009). Life cycle modeling is composed of four procedures, including goal definition and scope, inventory, impact analysis and interpretation. It can evaluate feed production, hatchery, farming, transport, processing, distribution and sales, consumption, and waste management. The LCA can provide a framework for evaluating environmental performance and identifying the limiting steps in energy or material use, as well as global warming and eutrophication potential. Many effects of aquaculture are based upon widely differing impacts, such as fresh and sea water use, feed use, energy consumption, nutrient discharge, and transportation of aquaculture products. These are very difficult characteristics to compare with a common metric. The purpose of this analysis is to build such comparisons, using LCA for outdoor flow-through shrimp production systems in China. The LCA has been widely applied to industrial and food products (Baumann, 1996; Munkung and Gheewala, 2007). Comparative LCA studies have been conducted to evaluate different production systems or services to identify the most environmentally friendly systems or services (Ziegler et al. 2001; Papatryphon et al., 2004; Munkung, 2005; Zufia and Arana, 2008; Ayer and Tyedmers, 2009). Mungkung (2005) studied Thai shrimp aquaculture and identified the farming stage as contributing the majority of environmental burdens overall. The environmental impacts of shrimp aquaculture systems have yet to be assessed in China, where features such as broodstock source, energy and water use, farm type and management are different. This study uses LCA as a tool to quantify and compare the potential environmental impacts associated with shrimp production by three common scenarios in China: Scenario 1: intensive farming destined for oversea markets, using larvae produced by imported SPF broodstock; Scenario 2: semi-intensive farming destined for national markets using larvae produced by imported SPF broodstock; Scenario 3: extensive farming destined for local markets using larvae produced by local domesticated broodstock. By quantifying the environmental impacts over the entire life cycle of shrimp production, LCA provides more comprehensive information on environmental performance for these three scenarios. The key life cycle stages and most significant impacts can be identified to enable a more effective approach to reducing the environmental footprint of shrimp farming. The objectives of the present study were to: (1) identify key stages and assess the most significant environmental impacts associated with outdoor shrimp production systems using LCA; (2) compare the environmental performance of three outdoor shrimp farming systems in China; (3) use the LCA results as basis to formulate strategies to reduce environmental impacts. METHODS Site Selection A field trip was conducted during summer 2008 on Hainan Island, China. Hainan Province, composed of the Hainan Island, Xisha Islands, Nansha Islands, and Zhongsha Island, is located in the tropic zone in southern China. Numerous beaches along the island's long coastline make the island a favorable breeding g