In Vitro Activity of 23 Antifungal Drugs against 54 Clinical and Environmental Aspergillus oryzae isolates

Mahdi Abastabar,Arezoo Zaedi,Shafigheh Shabanzadeh,Mohsen Nosratabadi,Maryam Moazeni,Seyed Reza Aghili,Iman Haghani,Shaghayegh Khojasteh,Javad Javidnia,Sanaz Nargesi,Tahereh Shokohi,Mohammad Taghi Hedayati,Jacques F. Meis,Hamid Badali
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/myc.13481
2022-06-12
Mycoses
Abstract:The treatment of invasive aspergillosis caused by cryptic species remains a challenge due to the lack of randomized clinical trials and investigation of the efficacy and safety of different therapeutic strategies. We aimed to evaluate the in vitro activity of 23 conventional and new antifungal drugs against 54 clinical and environmental Aspergillus oryzae isolates by using the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) standard M38‐A3. The lowest geometric mean MIC values were found for luliconazole and lanoconazole (0.001 μg/ml), followed by anidulafungin (0.104 μg/ml), posaconazole (0.15 μg/ml), itraconazole (0.37 μg/ml), efinaconazole (0.5 μg/ml), voriconazole (0.51 μg/ml), tavaborole (0.72 μg/ml), and amphotericin B (0.79 μg/ml). In contrast, ketoconazole, terbinafine, econazole, tioconazole, ravuconazole, miconazole, nystatin, clotrimazole, griseofulvin, sertaconazole, natamycin, tolnaftate, and fluconazole had no or low activity. Further studies are required to determine how well this in vitro activity translates into in vivo efficacy.
dermatology,mycology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?