Abstract:To gather impressions from patients/caregivers/advocates with acute leukemia regarding preferences for accessing scientific information, the value of patients as authors of scientific publications, and the format of plain language summaries (PLS). In addition, use of an asynchronous virtual advisory board (VAB) was piloted with this group. We conducted a 14-day asynchronous VAB (using SkyBoard) with six patients/caregivers/advocates. Patients/caregivers/advocates were identified in collaboration with the Acute Leukemia Advocates Network. Asynchronous VABs are an alternative to in-person advisory boards/synchronous VABs (video conferencing), enabling patients/caregivers/advocates to interact with VABs/each other in their own time. Platform features used to gather data included surveys, online forums, and content reviews of PLS. An international group of patients/caregivers/advocates were actively engaged in the VAB at convenient times for them. Privacy settings allowed for partial anonymity (personal details not shown) while enabling interactions with peers/facilitators. Key learnings included: patients/caregivers/advocates trust advocacy organizations to deliver scientific information; patients/caregivers/advocates often feel overwhelmed by the volume of scientific information available/seek a central hub for information; patients/caregivers/advocates are aware of PLS; advocates are well suited to co-author scientific publications/disseminate PLS; and PLS should include varying levels of detail to satisfy all patients/caregivers/advocates needs. Video is also the most preferred alternative format to infographic PLS. Patients/caregivers/advocates welcomed the opportunity to discuss the communication of scientific information. The asynchronous VAB was an effective and efficient format for individuals to interact, assess materials and engage in virtual discussion. Feedback resulted in the development of a video abstract PLS for an oncology congress. Asynchronous VABs offer advantages to in-person advisory boards, including flexibility, convenience, and low cost. Scientific communication platforms (SCPs) support consistent and accurate communication around pharmaceutical products. As development requires significant investment of budget and time, our aim was to understand SCP perception and use. An 18-item, online survey was developed to gather insights into company employees' awareness and use of SCPs and emailed to >900 recipients across functions. The survey was active from 1 to 18 November 2021. Of 115 respondents, 60% were in a medical role and 52% were local employees. 46 (40%) were aware of SCPs. A higher proportion (52%) of those in a medical role were aware of SCPs. More respondents in a global role (23/53 [43%]) were aware of SCPs than those in a local role (22/60 [37%]). Of respondents aware of SCPs, most (79%) knew where to find or start looking for them, or who to ask to locate them. This was consistent for global and local employees. The majority (67%) of respondents who were aware of SCPs were also aware that they were regularly updated. Of respondents aware of SCPs, 20 (43%) reported regular or occasional use. Among 40 respondents who had used SCPs, 75% and 72.5% highly rated the usefulness and quality/accuracy of SCPs, respectively. Most frequent SCP use was in educational materials (23/40 [58%]), congress materials (14 [35%]), and publication planning/development (12 [30%]). Awareness of SCPs was more common among employees in global roles and in the medical function. Our findings highlight the need for frequent communication and/or education around SCPs to cross-functional and regional colleagues to increase uptake and engagement. Journals are publishing peer-reviewed podcasts summarizing the latest findings presented at scientific congresses. However, they are not in plain language to appeal to broader audiences, including patients/patient advocates. Our objective was to create a process for developing plain language podcasts to increase accessibility to relevant data from congresses for patients and HCPs. We used a collaborative process to publish a peer-reviewed, citable, plain language podcast (Figure 1). The peer-reviewed plain language podcast of the European Society for Medical Oncology 2021 congress was accepted for publication in Oncology and Therapy in 2022. The podcast (and transcript/glossary) is available on PubMed, Google Podcasts, and Spotify. It focuses on topics such as patient involvement at congresses, as well as data in bladder/kidney cancer. We successfully published a peer-reviewed, citeable, plain language podcast. We believe this process will facilitate the development of further podcasts, increasing the accessibility of data presented at scientific congresses, while empowering patients and HCPs to engage with research. Healthcare systems contribute to approximately 5% of national carbon footprints, with up to -Abstract Truncated-

Improving access to oncology publications for advocates and people with cancer

Abstract B001: Engaging patient advocates in the battle against cancer directly in their communities in culturally and language specific ways

Abstract 4187: Development of a virtual platform to improve global access to oncology education & combat healthcare inequities

Lay summaries of open access journal articles: engaging with the general public on medical research

Original Abstracts from the 18th Annual Meeting of ISMPP

Patient engagement and advocacy considerations in development and implementation of a multicancer early detection program

A survey-based assessment of internet and social media use by oncology patients and their caregivers for health-related education.

Patient engagement in designing and publishing research in prostate cancer: a scoping review

Health literacy in e-oncology care: challenges and strategies

How Advocates Can Support Young Adults Living With Cancer and Their Transition to Palliative Care

Improving Patient Understanding and Outcomes in Lung Cancer Using an Animated Patient's Guide with Visual Formats of Learning

Abstract B104: Identifying gaps in equitable cancer care: insights from US-based oncology professionals engaged in continuing medical education

Data from Advancing Global Health Equity in Oncology Clinical Trial Access

Abstract B105: Quality and Accessibility of Online Information Regarding CAR-T Therapy in Hematologic Malignancies

Assessing the health care needs of adolescent and young adult cancer patients and survivors

Global Workforce and Access: Demand, Education, Quality

Updates in global oncology: Advancements and future directions

Abstract A064: My Choices: A multilevel, multicomponent intervention to improve informed decision-making about clinical trial participation among cancer patients

Social media engagement of supportive care publications in oncology

Publishing habits and perceptions of open access publishing and public access amongst clinical and research fellows

Enhancing life after cancer in diverse communities.