Real‐life effectiveness of sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir in hepatitis C patients previously treated with sofosbuvir/velpatasvir or glecaprevir/pibrentasvir
Juan Carlos Ruiz‐Cobo,Jordi Llaneras,Xavier Forns,Adolfo Gallego Moya,Isabel Conde Amiel,Ana Arencibia,Moises Diago,Javier García‐Samaniego,Jose Castellote,Susana Llerena,Elisa Rodríguez‐Seguel,Beatriz Mateos,Manuel Rodríguez,Jose Miguel Rosales Zabal,Inmaculada Fernández,Jose Luis Calleja,Rosa María Morillas,Silvia Montoliu,Raul J. Andrade,Ester Badia Aranda,Manuel Hernández‐Guerra,Carlota Jimeno Maté,Jesús M. González‐Santiago,Beatriz de Cuenca,Vanesa Bernal‐Monterde,Manuel Delgado,Juan Turnes,Sabela Lens,María Buti
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.18020
IF: 9.524
2024-05-04
Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Abstract:Sofosbuvir, velpatasvir and voxilaprevir (SOF/VEL/VOX) is an effective rescue therapy for patients with chronic hepatitis C infection who have failed SOF/VEL and glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (GLE/PIB), achieving sustained virological response (SVR) in 89% of patients who completed treatment. There is a non‐significant trend towards lower SVR rates in patients with GT3 HCV infection, cirrhosis and prior therapy with SOF/VEL. Summary Background Sofosbuvir, velpatasvir and voxilaprevir (SOF/VEL/VOX) is the recommended rescue therapy for patients with chronic hepatitis C infection who fail direct‐acting antivirals (DAAs). Data are limited on the effectiveness of this treatment after the current first‐line therapies. Our aim was to analyse the effectiveness and safety of SOF/VEL/VOX among patients failing sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (SOF/VEL) or glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (GLE/PIB). Methods Retrospective multicentre study (26 Spanish hospitals), including chronic hepatitis C patients unsuccessfully treated with SOF/VEL or GLE/PIB, and retreated with SOF/VEL/VOX ± ribavirin for 12 weeks between December 2017 and December 2022. Results In total, 142 patients included: 100 (70.4%) had failed SOF/VEL and 42 (29.6%) GLE/PIB. Patients were mainly men (84.5%), White (93.9%), with hepatitis C virus genotype (GT) 3 (49.6%) and 47.2% had liver cirrhosis. Sustained virological response (SVR) was evaluated in 132 patients who completed SOF/VEL/VOX and were followed 12 weeks after end of treatment; 117 (88.6%) achieved SVR. There were no significant differences in SVR rates according to initial DAA treatment (SOF/VEL 87.9% vs. GLE/PIB 90.2%, p = 0.8), cirrhosis (no cirrhosis 90% vs. cirrhosis 87.1%, p = 0.6) or GT3 infection (non‐GT3 91.9% vs. GT3 85.5%, p = 0.3). However, when considering the concurrent presence of SOF/VEL treatment, cirrhosis and GT3 infection, SVR rates dropped to 82.8%. Ribavirin was added in 8 (6%) patients, all achieved SVR. Conclusion SOF/VEL/VOX is an effective rescue therapy for failures to SOF/VEL or GLE/PIB, with an SVR of 88.6%. Factors previously linked to lower SVR rates, such as GT3 infection, cirrhosis and first‐line therapy with SOF/VEL were not associated with lower SVRs.
pharmacology & pharmacy,gastroenterology & hepatology