Shared and specific dynamics of brain activity and connectivity in amnestic and nonamnestic mild cognitive impairment

Xiaomei Zhong,Ben Chen,Le Hou,Qiang Wang,Meiling Liu,Mingfeng Yang,Min Zhang,Huarong Zhou,Zhangying Wu,Si Zhang,Gaohong Lin,Yuping Ning
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cns.13937
2022-08-30
Abstract:The aMCI and naMCI patients exhibited shared and specific patterns of dynamic brain segregation and integration. The segregation of superior parietal lobule and integrations of hippocampus‐cerebellum contributed to the memory heterogeneity of MCI subtypes. These results may not only enhance the understanding of the different mechanisms between MCI subtypes but also provide more potential targets for their neuromodulation and prevent them from developing dementia. Aims The present study aimed to compare temporal variability in the spontaneous fluctuations of activity and connectivity between amnestic MCI (aMCI) and nonamnestic MCI (naMCI), which enhances the understanding of their different pathophysiologies and provides targets for individualized intervention. Methods Sixty‐five naMCI and 48 aMCI subjects and 75 healthy controls were recruited. A sliding window analysis was used to evaluate the dynamic amplitude of low‐frequency fluctuations (dALFF), dynamic regional homogeneity (dReHo), and dynamic functional connectivity (dFC). The caudal/rostral hippocampus was selected as the seeds for calculating dFC. Results Both aMCI and naMCI exhibited abnormal dALFF, dReHo, and hippocampal dFC compared with healthy controls. Compared with individuals with naMCI, those with aMCI exhibited (1) higher dALFF variability in the right putamen, left Rolandic operculum, and right middle cingulum, (2) lower dReHo variability in the right superior parietal lobule, and (3) lower dFC variability between the hippocampus and other regions (left superior occipital gyrus, middle frontal gyrus, inferior cerebellum, precuneus, and right superior frontal gyrus). Additionally, variability in dALFF, dReHo, and hippocampal dFC exhibited different associations with cognitive scores in aMCI and naMCI patients, respectively. Finally, dReHo variability in the right superior parietal lobule and dFC variability between the right caudal hippocampus and left inferior cerebellum exhibited partially mediated effects on the different memory scores between people with aMCI and naMCI. Conclusion The aMCI and naMCI patients exhibited shared and specific patterns of dynamic brain activity and connectivity. The dReHo of the superior parietal lobule and dFC of the hippocampus‐cerebellum contributed to the memory heterogeneity of MCI subtypes. Analyzing the temporal variability in the spontaneous fluctuations of brain activity and connectivity provided a new perspective for exploring the different pathophysiological mechanisms in MCI subtypes.
pharmacology & pharmacy,neurosciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?