Research priorities for the management of major trauma: an international priority setting partnership with the James Lind Alliance
Christopher Patrick Bretherton,Robert Hirst,Hamez Gacaferi,Jonathan Gower,Lauren Exell,Scott Johnston,Shan Martin,Caroline Leech,Catherine Hilton,Ceri Battle,Daniel Axelrod,Heather Vallier,Daphne Van Embden,David J Stockton,Elaine Cole,Julia Williams,Louise Johnson,Maritz Laubscher,Melissa Webb,Philip Braude,Sarah Norris,Steve Bell,Sithombo Maqungo,Xavier Luke Griffin,Major Trauma Priority Setting Partnership Steering Group,Caroline James,Carrol Lamouline,Russell Neighbour,Yesmin Begum,Akshay Patel,Angelos Kolias,Carl Smith,Claire Jackson,Edward Caruana,Fiona Lecky,Gordon Fuller,Ian Greaves,Jacqueline Robson,Justine Theaker,Karim Brohi,Mary Breslin,Michael Wilson,Naomi Davis,Rachel Jenner,Rayner Maayen,Ross Davenport,Sarah Hendrickson,Spencer Wade
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083450
IF: 3.006
2024-05-15
BMJ Open
Abstract:Objective: The objective of this study is to determine research priorities for the management of major trauma, representing the shared priorities of patients, their families, carers and healthcare professionals. Design/setting: An international research priority-setting partnership. Participants: People who have experienced major trauma, their carers and relatives, and healthcare professionals involved in treating patients after major trauma. The scope included chest, abdominal and pelvic injuries as well as major bleeding, multiple injuries and those that threaten life or limb. Methods: A multiphase priority-setting exercise was conducted in partnership with the James Lind Alliance over 24 months (November 2021-October 2023). An international survey asked respondents to submit their research uncertainties which were then combined into several indicative questions. The existing evidence was searched to ensure that the questions had not already been sufficiently answered. A second international survey asked respondents to prioritise the research questions. A final shortlist of 19 questions was taken to a stakeholder workshop, where consensus was reached on the top 10 priorities. Results: A total of 1572 uncertainties, submitted by 417 respondents (including 132 patients and carers), were received during the initial survey. These were refined into 53 unique indicative questions, of which all 53 were judged to be true uncertainties after reviewing the existing evidence. 373 people (including 115 patients and carers) responded to the interim prioritisation survey and 19 questions were taken to a final consensus workshop between patients, carers and healthcare professionals. At the final workshop, a consensus was reached for the ranking of the top 10 questions. Conclusions: The top 10 research priorities for major trauma include patient-centred questions regarding pain relief and prehospital management, multidisciplinary working, novel technologies, rehabilitation and holistic support. These shared priorities will now be used to guide funders and teams wishing to research major trauma around the globe.