Abstract:Sudden-onset disasters frequently trigger an unexpected surge in demand for essential emergency supplies. Although current approaches prioritize cost-effectiveness and on-time delivery, they often neglect the suffering of disaster victims caused by insufficient emergency supplies. Our research aims to bridge this gap by mitigating the suffering of affected individuals while avoiding excessive costs. Initially, we integrate an option contract (OC) into a single-authority and −supplier framework agreement (FA). The cumulative suffering experienced by the affected population during deprivation periods is quantified under the FA. The supplier aims to maximize profit, while the government seeks to maximize social efficiency, defined as the ratio of the averted suffering to logistics costs. Subsequently, an option-based model for prepositioning and pricing emergency supplies is proposed. The results indicate that more suffering is averted by an OC in comparison to a wholesale contract (WC). Moreover, the option-based model is more cost-effective when the price of emergency purchases falls within a Goldilocks range, thus providing an optimal strike price for executing emergency options that maximizes social efficiency. Finally, we extend the model and observe that varying demand distributions indeed influence humanitarian decision-makers’ optimal decision strategies and seemingly have little effect on the feasibility of incorporating OCs into the prepositioning and procurement of emergency supplies, and that the dual mode of physical and production capacity reserves reduces to the single physical reserve mode when the urgent production cost exceeds a certain threshold. Additionally, the duration required deliver emergency supplies to the beneficiaries is prolonged with the increase in urgent conversion time, which leads to a reduction in social efficiency. Our research proposes a people-oriented, option-based mechanism for prepositioning and procuring emergency supplies to improve social efficiency, with a focus on the alleviation of the affected individuals’ suffering. Various measures are presented for emergency practitioners concerning the prepositioning and pricing of emergency supplies, thereby fostering an enduring government-enterprise cooperative relationship.

Dual-Source Procurement Strategies of Emergency Materials Considering Risk Attitudes

Supply Chain Coordination under Asymmetric Risk Aversion Information

Multi-scenario flexible contract coordination for determining the quantity of emergency medical suppliers in public health events

Contract coordination of emergency supply chain with government participation considering risk aversion of participants

Procurement Risk Management of Raw Materials Via Combined Use of Option Contracts and Spot Markets

Emergency supplies prepositioning via a government-led supply chain with a loss-averse supplier with anchoring

Dual-Source Procurement and Supplier Pricing Decision under Supply Interruption

Managing Emergency Procurement Using Option Contract under Supply Disruption and Demand Uncertainty

A cost-effective model for emergency supplies prepositioning and procurement pricing via option contracts

Coordinating an emergency medical material supply chain with CVaR under the pandemic considering corporate social responsibility

Emergency Logistics Facilities Location Dual-Objective Modeling in Uncertain Environments

Emergency Materials Supply Chain Coordination by the Joint Mechanism between Government and Enterprises

Emergency Decision-Making Model of Suppliers with Updating Information in Cases of Sudden Accidents

An emergency supplies procurement strategy based on a bidirectional option contract

Dual sourcing for mitigating humanitarian supply chain disruptions

Dual Sourcing Decisions under Exchange Rate and Supply Risks

Supplier selection decision making in disaster response

How to avoid source disruption of emergency supplies in emergency supply chains: A subsidy perspective

An Emergency Quantity Discount Contract with Supplier Risk Aversion under the Asymmetric Information of Sales Costs

Risk-Averse Co-Decision for Lower-Carbon Product Family Configuration and Resilient Supplier Selection

Emergency Resource Layout with Multiple Objectives under Complex Disaster Scenarios