Is the Gestational Weight Gain Recommended by the National Academy of Medicine Guidelines Suitable for Chinese Twin-Pregnant Women with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus?
Jiamiao Dai,Xiaoxiao Fan,Jing He,Ruixue Tian,Jingqi Xu,Jiayang Song,Xiangxu Chen,Lu Han,Yanlin Chen,Li Peng,Qiongya Cao,Jinbing Bai,Zhen Chen,Yanqun Liu,Zhijie Zou,Xiaoli Chen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1754319
2024-01-01
American Journal of Perinatology
Abstract:Objectives This study aimed to assess the applicability of the National Academy of Medicine (NAM) interim guidelines for twin pregnancies to the specific population of gestational diabetes mellitus by exploring the relationship between gestational weight gain and adverse pregnancy outcomes in Chinese twin-pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus. Study Design This was a retrospective cohort study of women diagnosed with diabetes in pregnancy between July 2017 and December 2020 at the Maternal and Child Health Hospital in Chongqing, China. The primary variable of interest was maternal total gestational weight gain. The primary outcomes were perinatal outcomes, which included: preeclampsia, small for gestational age, large for gestational age, low birth weight, neonatal pneumonia, neonatal respiratory distress syndrome, and neonatal intensive unit admission, etc. The association between inappropriate gestational weight gain and adverse pregnancy outcomes was estimated using multiple logistic regression analysis. Results A total of 455 twin-pregnant women who had gestational diabetes mellitus were analyzed. Women with low gestational weight gain had reduced risk of preeclampsia (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.32; 95% CI or confidence interval, 0.17-0.63; p = 0.001) and their infants had higher risks of small for gestational age (aOR, 1.93; 95% CI, 1.04-3.58; p = 0.037), low birth weight (aOR, 2.27; 95% CI, 1.32-3.90; p = 0.003), neonatal intensive unit admission (aOR, 3.29; 95% CI, 1.10-5.78; p = 0.038), pneumonia (aOR, 2.41; 95% CI, 1.08-5.33; p = 0.031), and neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (aOR, 2.29; 95% CI, 1.10-4.78; p = 0.027); the infants of women with excessive gestational weight gain had a higher risk of large for gestational age (aOR, 3.76; 95% CI, 1.42-9.96; p = 0.008). Conclusion Gestational weight gain controlled within the range recommended by the NAM could reduce the risk of perinatal adverse outcomes. The 2009 NAM gestational weight gain recommendations can be used for Chinese twin-pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus.