Trends and Hotspots in the Health Economics Evaluation of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome
Hejia Wan,Bingqi Wei,Wenli Qian,Jing Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/jmdh.s482100
2024-10-25
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
Abstract:Hejia Wan, 1, &ast Bingqi Wei, 2, &ast Wenli Qian, 3 Jing Zhang 1 1 School of Nursing, Henan University of Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, People's Republic of China; 2 School of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Henan University of Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, People's Republic of China; 3 School of Management, Henan University of Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, People's Republic of China &astThese authors contributed equally to this work Correspondence: Jing Zhang, Email Objective: To explore the research trends and hotspots of health economics evaluations of patients with chronic fatigue syndrome. Methods: To explore the research trends and hotspots of health economics evaluations of chronic fatigue syndrome, 180 articles published between 1991 and 2024 were visualized and analyzed via CiteSpace 6.3 software. R3 and VOSviewer1.6.20 and R4.3.3. The content includes annual publication volume, journal distribution, author country, publishing organization, author collaboration, citation analysis, and keyword analysis in 7 aspects. Results: Fewer studies have evaluated the health economics of individuals with chronic fatigue syndrome in China and abroad, Chinese studies are especially rare, and research results in the UK are mostly found in other countries. Moreover, cooperation and linkages between institutions, as well as between authors, are not yet strong. Conclusion: The hotspot of health economics evaluation methods in this field is cost-effectiveness analysis, and the hotspot of diagnosis and treatment methods is cognitive‒behavioral therapy. We also found that chronic fatigue syndrome may also have a strong potential association with depression from the perspective of health economics. Health economic evaluations of multiple treatments should be conducted simultaneously to increase attention to this field and provide a reference basis for low-cost and high-quality diagnostic and treatment programs. Keywords: chronic fatigue syndrome, myalgic encephalomyelitis, health economics, CiteSpace, visual analysis, bibliometrics Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), formerly known as myalgic Encephalomyelitis (ME), is a complex disease characterized by fatigue symptoms that cannot be relieved even after rest, recurrent episodes or lasting for six months or more, accompanied by symptoms such as sore throat, decreased attention, and muscle pain. 1,2 The incidence of chronic fatigue syndrome ranges from 0.1% to 0.7%, and many people are unable to work or can only engage in part-time work. Patients require long periods of rest and occupy social and other time. It is estimated that individuals with chronic fatigue syndrome abroad lose nearly $20000 per year. Patients face high economic pressure and are not conducive to socio-economic development. 3,4 The epidemiology of chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) has been a topic of interest in the medical community for several decades. Manu et al reported that the average age of individuals with CFS was 38.1 years, with an average duration of fatigue of 6.9 years at the time of entry into the study. The authors highlighted the need for further research to determine whether CFS is a distinct entity or a variant of psychiatric illness. 5 Bearn et al emphasized the use of the term chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) following international consensus due to the complexity of the neurobiological aspects associated with this condition. 6 As a result, most of the research on chronic fatigue syndrome has been based on epidemiologic research, and little has been done in terms of biology or pathology. In the real world, in addition to direct physiological or biological studies of a disease, the evaluation of interventions is also very important. 7 Health economics evaluations play a critical role in informing decision-making processes about health care interventions and policies and explore the use of economic evaluations in different contexts to assess the cost-effectiveness and impact of interventions. 8 As early as 1996, studies comparing differences in employment status, self-reported disability, number of medical visits, types of services received, and other diagnoses among patients with chronic fatigue, chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), fibromyalgia (FM), and comorbidities of CFS and FM revealed that patients with chronic fatigue, regardless of whether they met the diagnostic criteria for CFS or FM, had significant individual occupational impacts and lower employment rates, indicating a potentially significant economic burden. 9 Peter Thomas et al subsequently evaluated the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of group-based cognit -Abstract Truncated-
health care sciences & services