Evaluation of artificial intelligence algorithms with sensor data assimilation in estimating crop evapotranspiration and crop water stress index for irrigation water management
Abia Katimbo,Daran R. Rudnick,Jingwen Zhang,Yufeng Ge,Kendall C. DeJonge,Trenton E. Franz,Yeyin Shi,Wei-zhen Liang,Xin Qiao,Derek M. Heeren,Isa Kabenge,Hope Njuki Nakabuye,Jiaming Duan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atech.2023.100176
2023-01-25
Smart Agricultural Technology
Abstract:Highlights • Sensor measurements of weather, canopy temperature, soil moisture, and normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) were used to predict ET c and CWSI. • Ten artificial intelligence algorithms and three machine learning ensembles were evaluated with different input combinations. • CatBoost and Stacked Regression performed best when estimating CWSI and ET c , respectively. • Best performing models can further be used to develop a decision support system for irrigation water management. Irrigation water management using automated irrigation decision support system (IDSS) as a smart irrigation scheduling tool can improve water use efficiency and crop production, especially under circumstances of limited water supply. The current study evaluated the performance of different artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms and their ensembles in forecasting Crop Evapotranspiration (ET c ) and Crop Water Stress Index (CWSI) against calculated single crop coefficient FAO56 ET c and Jackson's theoretical CWSI, respectively. Soil moisture, canopy temperatures (T c ) and Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) were all measured from irrigated and non-irrigated maize plots in West Central Nebraska during 2020 and 2021 growing seasons. There were fifteen and twelve input combinations used for ET c and CWSI predictions, respectively, having input variables such as weather and soil moisture as well as ancillary variables, including NDVI, reference evapotranspiration (ET r ), and cumulative growing degree days (CGDDs). While evaluating the models, four statistical performance indicators including coefficient of determination (r 2 ), root mean square error (RMSE), mean absoluter error (MAE), and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) were used. Furthermore, ranking scores were performed on statistical results to find the overall best model across all the input combinations. Based on total ranking scores, CatBoost (RMSE ranging between 0.06 – 0.09 unitless) was the best model in predicting CWSI, while Stacked Regression (RMSE ranging between 0.27 – 0.72 mm d −1 ) was the best model for ET c estimation. Future research will consider designing and evaluating an IDSS using identified best machine learning models to establish soil water and plant stress feedback for automated irrigation scheduling.