Abstract:The reactive capacity of the muscle-tendon complex is commonly assessed using the reactive strength index (RSI). Conventionally, the RSI is a ratio of rebound jump height to ground contact time in depth jumping. Several assumptions regarding the linear mechanics acting through the whole-body center of gravity may threaten the internal validity of computation and interpretation of RSI scores. First, it is common for rebound jump height to be predicted from rebound jump flight time. This assumes that the angular positioning of body segments is equivalent at the time instances of rebound jump take-off and landing. Prior literature supports a mixed-methods approach for computing the RSI that is void of this assumption. The mixed-methods approach gives a more valid estimation of rebound jump height. In this approach, rebound jump height is estimated from rebound jump take-off velocity of the whole-body center of mass. This is accomplished by subtracting an estimate of impact velocity, acquired using videography, from change in whole-body center of mass velocity estimated from integrated vertical ground reaction force data. Second, it is often assumed that vertical displacement of the whole-body center of mass during the drop phase of the depth jump is predicted perfectly from the height of the platform used to perform the drop. This assumption may affect the internal validity of comparing RSI scores across individuals and within individuals performing depth jumps from varied heights. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the internal validity of RSI scores computed using the conventional approach and impact velocity variability, which may affect the interpretation of RSI scores. Seventy physically active young adults performed depth jumps from drop heights of 0.51, 0.66, and 0.81 m. RSI was computed using the conventional approach and a mixed-methods approach featuring the use of 2-dimensional videography, body segment parameters, and force platform dynamometry. The two computational methods were compared using linear regression performed on data from each drop height. In addition, a 2 (computational method) by 3 (drop height) Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was performed to evaluate for main effects and interactions in RSI data. Multiple one sample t-tests were performed to compare estimated and theoretical impact velocities. The ANOVA revealed no main effect or interactions between computational approaches (p = 0.467-0.938). Linear regression revealed moderately strong associations between RSI scores computed using the conventional and mixed-methods approaches (R2 = 0.685-0.741). Moreover, linear regressions revealed that the conventional approach tends to overestimate the mixed methods approach for RSI scores below 1.0 and underestimate the mixed methods approach for RSI scores above 1.0. Lastly, estimated impact velocities were observed to be as much as 13% lower versus theoretical (p < 0.001). Researchers with access to motion capture and force platform technology may consider using a mixed-methods approach for computing the RSI, which likely maximizes the internal validity of scores. In addition, results suggest for practitioners to practice caution when comparing conventional RSI scores across individuals.

Comparing Numerical Methods to Estimate Vertical Jump Height Using a Force Platform

Vertical Jump Height Estimation Algorithm based on Vertical Acceleration Profile Characteristics via Foot-Worn Inertial Sensing.

The Battle of the Equations: A Systematic Review of Jump Height Calculations Using Force Platforms

Comparison and analysis of three different methods to evaluate vertical jump height

Discrepancy Among Different Methods for Vertical Jump Height Determination and Its Implications for Field-Based Testing: A Narrative Review

COMPARISON OF THREE DIFFERENT MEASUREMENT SYSTEMS TO ASSESS THE VERTICAL JUMP HEIGHT

Agreement between Force Platform and Smartphone Application-Derived Measures of Vertical Jump Height in Youth Grassroots Soccer Players

Comparison of the Reliability of Four Different Movement Thresholds When Evaluating Vertical Jump Performance

Correlation and Reliability of Two Field Tests for Vertical Jump Height

Measurement errors when estimating the vertical jump height with flight time using photocell devices: the example of Optojump

Concurrent validity and reliability of photoelectric and accelerometer technology for calculating vertical jump height in female athletes

Validity of vertical jump measurement devices

Comparison of Different Take-off Thresholds When Assessing Vertical Jump Performance

Common Vertical Jump and Reactive Strength Index Measuring Devices: A Validity and Reliability Analysis

COMPARISON OF VARIOUS DEVICES USED IN THE EVALUATION OF VERTICAL JUMP HEIGHT

Analysis of Rate of Force Development as a Vertical Jump Height Predictor

A Mixed-Methods Approach to Evaluating the Internal Validity of the Reactive Strength Index

Error in jump height estimation using the flight time method: simulation of the effect of ankle position between takeoff and landing

Flight-Time Method Modified: Development of a Novel and More Accurate Method for Measuring Vertical Jump Height Using a Smartphone Application

Phase Specific Comparisons of High and Low Vertical Jump Performance in Collegiate Female Athletes

The validity and reliability of an iPhone app for measuring vertical jump performance