Impact of Controlled Attenuation Parameter on Detecting Fibrosis Using Liver Stiffness Measurement.
T. Karlas,D. Petroff,M. Sasso,J. -G. Fan,Y. -Q. Mi,V. de Ledinghen,M. Kumar,M. Lupsor-Platon,K. -H. Han,A. C. Cardoso,G. Ferraioli,W. -K. Chan,V. W. -S. Wong,R. P. Myers,K. Chayama,M. Friedrich-Rust,M. Beaugrand,F. Shen,J. -B. Hiriart,S. K. Sarin,R. Badea,H. W. Lee,P. Marcellin,C. Filice,S. Mahadeva,G. L. -H. Wong,P. Crotty,K. Masaki,J. Bojunga,P. Bedossa,V. Keim,J. Wiegand
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.14529
IF: 9.524
2018-01-01
Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Abstract:Background: Liver fibrosis is often accompanied by steatosis, particularly in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), and its non-invasive characterisation is of utmost importance. Vibration-controlled transient elastography is the non-invasive method of choice; however, recent research suggests that steatosis may influence its diagnostic performance. Controlled Attenuation Parameter (CAP) added to transient elastography enables simultaneous assessment of steatosis and fibrosis. Aim: To determine how to use CAP in interpreting liver stiffness measurements. Methods: This is a secondary analysis of data from an individual patient data meta-analysis on CAP. The main exclusion criteria for the current analysis were unknown aetiology, unreliable elastography measurement and data already used for the same research question. Aetiology-specific liver stiffness measurement cut-offs were determined and used to estimate positive and negative predictive values (PPV/NPV) with logistic regression as functions of CAP. Results: Two thousand and fifty eight patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria (37% women, 18% NAFLD/NASH, 42% HBV, 40% HCV, 51% significant fibrosisF2). Youden optimised cut-offs were only sufficient for ruling out cirrhosis (NPV of 98%). With sensitivity and specificity-optimised cut-offs, NPV for ruling out significant fibrosis was moderate (70%) and could be improved slightly through consideration of CAP. PPV for significant fibrosis and cirrhosis were 68% and 55% respectively, despite specificity-optimised cut-offs for cirrhosis. Conclusions: Liver stiffness measurement values below aetiology-specific cut-offs are very useful for ruling out cirrhosis, and to a lesser extent for ruling out significant fibrosis. In the case of the latter, Controlled Attenuation Parameter can improve interpretation slightly. Even if cut-offs are very high, liver stiffness measurements are not very reliable for ruling in fibrosis or cirrhosis.