Abstract:People can be uncertain in their moral judgments. Philosophers have argued that such uncertainty can either refer to the underlying empirical facts (empirical uncertainty) or to the normative evaluation of these facts itself (normative uncertainty). Psychological investigations of this distinction, however, are rare. In this paper, we combined factor‐analytical and experimental approaches to show that empirical and normative uncertainty describe two related but different psychological states. In Study 1, we asked N = 265 participants to describe a case of moral uncertainty and to rate different aspects of their uncertainty about this case. Across this wide range of moral scenarios, our items loaded onto three reliable factors: lack of information, unclear consequences, and normative uncertainty. In Study 2, we confirmed this factor structure using predefined stimulus material. N = 402 participants each rated eight scenarios that systematically varied in their degree of uncertainty regarding the consequences of the described actions and in the value conflict that was inherent to them. The empirical uncertainty factors were mainly affected by the introduction of uncertainty regarding consequences, and the normative uncertainty factor was mainly affected by the introduction of value conflict. Our studies provide evidence that the distinction between empirical and normative uncertainty accurately describes a psychological reality. We discuss the relevance of our findings for research on moral judgments and decision‐making, and folk metaethics.

An empirical argument against moral non-cognitivism

Non‐cognitivism about metaphysical explanation

The nonmoral conditions of moral cognition

Moral Knowledge and Ethic Objectivity

Moral Intuitions and Moral Nativism

Immoral realism

Moral Judgment and the Non-metaphysical Trend of Ethics

Why cognitivism?

Have Experimental Studies in Cognitive Science Indicate the Consequentialism ——A Reply on the Attack of Joshua Greene to kantian Ethics

The nature and plausibility of Cognitivism

Cognitivism and Metaphysical Weight: A Dilemma for Relaxed Realism

Moral Cognition in Criminal Punishment

Uncertain Facts or Uncertain Values? Testing the Distinction Between Empirical and Normative Uncertainty in Moral Judgments

Constitutivism and cognitivism

A Person-Centered Approach to Moral Judgment

Interpreting Moral Assertions from the Perspective of Neo-expressivism

Moral dumbfounding and imaginative resistance

Intentions, Intending, and Belief: Noninferential Weak Cognitivism

The Politics of Carnap’s Non-Cognitivism and the Scientific World-Conception of Left-Wing Logical Empiricism

Do emotions play an essential role in moral judgments?

The emotional dog and its rational tail: a social intuitionist approach to moral judgment.