Abstract:Language Teaching Research, Ahead of Print. This study, a follow-up to the research reported by Erlam, investigated K-12 content teachers' ability to design tasks for content instruction in U.S. schools. Thirty-nine K-12 teachers who were enrolled in an English as a second language (ESL) teaching methods course participated in the study and each designed two language learning tasks. Two researchers rated the tasks following Ellis and Shintani's four task criteria, as in Erlam. The study addressed the questions: (1) How successful are content teachers in designing tasks that satisfy Ellis and Shintani's criteria? (2) Which of the criteria do teachers find easiest and most difficult to satisfy? and (3) Do the teachers improve in meeting the criteria in a second round of task designs? Ninety-two percent and 95% of the tasks satisfied three of the four criteria in task designs 1 and 2, respectively. The teachers excelled most at creating contexts for meaningful communication (92%) and including an information gap (92%) in their first tasks. Incorporating a clearly defined outcome was the most difficult criterion (66%) for teachers to achieve. There was no significant improvement from Task 1 to Task 2 in successfully incorporating the four criteria. The content teachers incorporated more of the task features than the foreign language teachers in Erlam. Over 90% met the majority of the criteria, compared to 82% in Erlam's study. Another important difference was that participants in Erlam's study found the easiest criteria to address was including an outcome, and they struggled most to allow learners to use their own linguistic resources and incorporate a gap. The content teachers in the follow-up study struggled most to include an outcome, but consistently incorporated communication gaps and grew in their ability to ensure that learners use their own linguistic resources. This suggests that language teachers may focus more readily on language forms, while content teachers focus more on meaningful content than on language, providing support for learners to focus on meaning.

Replication in task-based language teaching research: Kim (2012) and Shintani (2012)

Replication in Second Language Research: Narrative and Systematic Reviews and Recommendations for the Field

Comparison of teaching methods for the emergence and maintenance of untaught relations in foreign language vocabulary acquisition: A systematic replication

Meta-analysis to estimate the relative effectiveness of TBLT programs: Are we there yet?

Examining second language vocabulary growth: Replications of Schmitt (1998) and Webb & Chang (2012)

TBLT implementation and evaluation: A meta-analysis

Task repetition, synchronous written corrective feedback and the learning of Korean grammar: A classroom-based study

Learning Language through Task Repetition

How effective is task-based language teaching to enhance second language learning? A technical comment on Bryfonski and McKay (2019)

The interface between instructed L2 pragmatics and TBLT research

TASK COMPLEXITY, FOCUS ON FORM, AND SECOND LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT

Task complexity, task repetition, and L2 writing complexity: exploring interactions in the TBLT domain

TASK-BASED LANGUAGE TEACHING IN VIETNAM: RESEARCH TRENDS, FINDINGS, AND IMPLICATIONS

Questioning the Effectiveness of Procedural Repetition: The Case of Spanish EFL Primary School Learners

K-12 content teachers designing language tasks: A follow-up to Erlam, 2016

Speak Beyond Borders: A Systematic Review of Task-Based Language Teaching for EFL Speaking Proficiency

Research trends in task-based language teaching: A bibliometric analysis from 1985 to 2020

A Study on the Application of Task-based Language Teaching Method in a Comprehensive English Class in China

ForeignLanguage Teaching Methods in Task-Based Learning

Replication of Special Education Research

Bringing replication and reproduction together with generalisability in NLP: Three reproduction studies for Target Dependent Sentiment Analysis