Pharmacological and physiological response in Apoe−/− mice exposed to cigarette smoke or e-cigarette aerosols

Matthew J. Eden,Yasmeen M. Farra,Jacqueline Matz,Chiara Bellini,Jessica M. Oakes
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08958378.2022.2086948
2022-07-07
Inhalation Toxicology
Abstract:Electronic cigarettes (e-cigs) are popular nicotine delivery devices, yet the health effects remain unclear. To determine equivalent biomarkers, we characterized the immediate response in Apoe −/− mice exposed to tank/box-mod e-cig (e-cig tank ), pod e-cig (e-cig pod ), or cig smoke. Reproducible puff profiles were generated for each aerosol and delivered to Apoe −/− mice via a nose-only exposure system. Serum cotinine levels were quantified at various time points through ELISA and utilized to model cotinine pharmacokinetics. In addition, particle size measurements and mouse respiratory function were characterized to calculate particle dosimetry. Cig and e-cig tank particles were lognormally distributed with similar count median diameters (cig: 178 ± 2, e-cig tank : 200 ± 34nm), while e-cig pod particles were bimodally distributed and smaller (116 ± 13 and 13.3 ± 0.4 nm). Minute volumes decreased with cig exposure (5.4 ± 2.7 mL/min) compared to baseline (90.8 ± 11.6 mL/min), and less so with e-cig tank (45.2 ± 9.2 mL/min) and e-cig pod exposures (58.6 ± 6.8 mL/min), due to periods of apnea in the cig exposed groups. Cotinine was absorbed and eliminated most rapidly in the e-cig pod group ( tmax = 14.5; t1/2' = 51.9 min), whereas cotinine was absorbed (cig: 50.4, e-cig tank : 40.1 min) and eliminated (cig: 104.6, e-cig tank : 94.1 min) similarly in the cig and e-cig tank groups. For exposure times which equate the area under the cotinine-concentration curve, ∼6.4× (e-cig tank ) and 4.6× (e-cig pod ) more nicotine deposited in e-cig compared to cig exposed mice. This study provides a basis for incorporating cotinine pharmacokinetics into preclinical exposure studies, allowing for longitudinal studies of structural and functional changes due to exposure. This study highlights that pod e-cigs deliver smaller particles than tank/box-mode e-cigs and cig smoke. Minute volumes were substantially reduced in cig smoke-exposed mice, due to periods of apnea, whereas only expiration times increased in the e-cig-exposed groups. More particles deposit in e-cig exposed mice, compared to the cig group, for equivalent daily area under the cotinine concentration curve.
toxicology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?