Abstract:Insufficient data are available to fully understand the effects of metal additive manufacturing (AM) defects for widespread adoption of the emerging technology. Characterization of failure processes of complex internal geometries and defects in metal AM can significantly enhance this understanding. We aim to demonstrate a complete experimental measurement process and failure analysis method to study the effects of AM defects. We utilized simultaneous implementation of tensile tests with high-resolution X-ray computed tomography (XCT) measurements on 17–4 stainless steel dog-bone samples with an intentional octahedron-shaped internal cavity included in the gauge length and also containing much smaller lack-of-fusion (LOF) defects, all generated by a Laser Powder Bed Fusion (LPBF) additive manufacturing process. The LOF defects were introduced by intentionally changing the LPBF default processing parameters. XCT image-based linear elastic finite element (FE) simulations were used to interpret the data. The in-situ tensile tests combined with simultaneous XCT measurements revealed the details of the failure process initiated by additively manufactured rough internal surfaces and porous defect structures, which experienced high stress concentrations. Progressive collapse of ligaments leading to larger pores was clearly observed, and the resulting porosity evolution until failure was quantitatively analyzed. The high stress concentrations were also directly confirmed by the FE simulations. The experimental methods described in this paper enable the quantitative study of the complex failure mechanisms of additively manufactured metal parts, and the image-based FE simulation method is effective for identifying and/or confirming possible failure locations and features.

Embedded QR code for part authentication in additive friction stir deposition

Embedded product authentication codes in additive manufactured parts: Imaging and image processing for improved scan ability

How Can We Provide Additively Manufactured Parts with a Fingerprint? A Review of Tagging Strategies in Additive Manufacturing

Obfuscation of Embedded Codes in Additive Manufactured Components for Product Authentication

My Smartphone Recognizes Genuine QR Codes!

Investigation of the Effect of Artificial Internal Defects on the Tensile Behavior of Laser Powder Bed Fusion 17–4 Stainless Steel Samples: Simultaneous Tensile Testing and X-Ray Computed Tomography

In situ real time defect detection of 3D printed parts

Information Embedding in Additively Manufactured Parts through Printing Speed Control

Automated non-destructive inspection of Fused Filament Fabrication components using Thermographic Signal Reconstruction

AirCode: Unobtrusive Physical Tags for Digital Fabrication

Nondestructive quantification of internal raster path for additively manufactured components via ultrasonic testing

A facile method for integrating direct-write devices into three-dimensional printed parts

Chlorella filled poly(lactic acid) (PLA)/poly(butylene adipate-co-terephthalate) (PBAT) blend bio-composites compatible with additive manufacturing processes: Fluorescent and anti-counterfeiting QR codes applications

My Smartphone Recognizes Genuine QR Codes!: Practical Unclonable QR Code via 3D Printing

Novel Anticounterfeiting Solution Based on 2D Materials Produced by Electrochemical Exfoliation

Implantable QR Code Subcutaneous Microchip Using Photoacoustic and Ultrasound Microscopy for Secure and Convenient Individual Identification and Authentication

Laser‐Induced Carbonization for Anticounterfeiting Tags

In-process ultrasonic inspection of first layer detachment during additive manufacturing

Femtosecond Laser Ablation of Quantum Dot Films toward Physical Unclonable Multilevel Fluorescent Anticounterfeiting Labels

A novel method to combine fused deposition modelling and inkjet printing in manufacturing multifunctional parts for aerospace application

Fabricating QR Codes on 3D Objects Using Self-Shadows