Abstract:Perineal lacerations could lead to substantial morbidities for women. A reliable prediction model for perineal lacerations has the potential to guide the prevention. Although several prediction models have been developed to estimate the risk of perineal lacerations, especially third- and fourth-degree perineal lacerations, the evidence about the model quality and clinical applicability is scarce. To systematically review and critically appraise the existing prediction models for perineal lacerations. Seven databases (PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, SinoMed, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang Data) were systematically searched from inception to July 2022. Studies that developed prediction models for perineal lacerations or performed external validation of existing models were considered eligible to include in the systematic review. Two reviewers independently conducted data extraction according to the Checklist for critical Appraisal and data extraction for systematic Reviews of prediction Modelling Studies. The risk of bias and the applicability of the included models were assessed with the Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool. A narrative synthesis was performed to summarize the characteristics, risk of bias, and performance of existing models. Of 4345 retrieved studies, 14 studies with 22 prediction models for perineal lacerations were included. The included models mainly aimed to estimate the risk of third- and fourth-degree perineal lacerations. The top five predictors used were operative vaginal birth (72.7 %), parity/previous vaginal birth (63.6 %), race/ethnicity (59.1 %), maternal age (50.0 %), and episiotomy (40.1 %). Internal and external validation was performed in 12 (54.5 %) and seven (31.8 %) models, respectively. 13 studies (92.9 %) assessed model discrimination, with the c-index ranging from 0.636 to 0.830. Seven studies (50.0 %) evaluated the model calibration using the Hosmer–Lemeshow test, Brier score, or calibration curve. The results indicated that most of the models had fairly good calibration. All the included models were at higher risk of bias mainly due to unclear or inappropriate methods for handling missing data and continuous predictors, external validation, and model performance evaluation. Six models (27.3 %) showed low concerns about applicability. The existing models for perineal lacerations were poorly validated and evaluated, among which only two have the potential for clinical use: one for women undergoing vaginal birth after cesarean delivery, and the other one for all women undergoing vaginal birth. Future studies should focus on robust external validation of existing models and the development of novel models for second-degree perineal laceration. CRD42022349786. The existing models for perineal lacerations during childbirth need external validation and updating. Tools are needed for second-degree perineal laceration.

Fascial Dehiscence and Incisional Hernia Prediction Models: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

The evaluation of risk factors in fascia dehiscence after abdominal surgeries

Impact of body fat location and volume on incisional hernia development and its outcomes following repair

THE DANGER OF OPERATING BY NUMBERS IN INCISIONAL HERNIA SURGERY

A Meta-Analysis of Tunica Vaginalis Fascia Versus Dartos Fascia to Prevent Postoperative Urethrocutaneous Fistula in Hypospadias and Fistula Repair

Pre-operative CT scan measurements for predicting complications in patients undergoing complex ventral hernia repair using the component separation technique

Prediction Models for Perineal Lacerations During Childbirth: A Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal

Quantifying Perioperative Risks for Antireflux and Hiatus Hernia Surgery

Prediction Models for Forecasting Risk of Development of Surgical Site Infection after Lower Limb Revascularization Surgery: A Systematic Review

Validation of Urostomy Parastomal Herniation Incisional Prevention Strategies

Application of machine learning algorithms to predict postoperative surgical site infections and surgical site occurrences following inguinal hernia surgery

Fascia defect closure versus non-closure in minimal invasive direct inguinal hernia mesh repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis of real-world evidence

A risk prediction model based on machine learning algorithm for parastomal hernia after permanent colostomy

Clinical prediction models and risk tools for early detection of patients at risk of surgical site infection and surgical wound dehiscence: a scoping review

Optimizing prediction models for pancreatic fistula after pancreatectomy: Current status and future perspectives

Predicting the success of vaginal surgery: a quantitative risk assessment model for future investigation.

Evaluation of risk factors associated with the peritoneal flap hernioplasty for complex incisional hernia repair - a retrospective review of 327 cases

Machine Learning to Dynamically Predict In-Hospital Venous Thromboembolism After Inguinal Hernia Surgery: Results From the CHAT-1 Study

Prophylactic Mesh Placement in High-Risk Patients Undergoing Elective Laparotomy: A Systematic Review

Risk factors for incisional hernia after open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Incisional Hernia in the United States: Trends in Hospital Encounters and Corresponding Healthcare Charges