Abstract:It is well established that monitoring one's memory performance involves engaging in metacognitive monitoring and activating the frontal cortex. Judgments of Learning (JOLs) are individuals' assessments of the likelihood of remembering a specific item on a future test, usually occurring after learning and before testing. An ongoing debate exists regarding whether participants' metacognitive monitoring is based on a single process or two distinct processes when making JOLs. In this study, we investigated the electrophysiological correlates of JOLs induced by an episodic memory task in 38 adult participants. Participants completed a word pairs memory task and rated their memory performance after remembered whole items. We observed that participants with high judgments of learning had faster reaction times compared to those with low judgments of learning. The electrophysiological results revealed that low judgments of learning were associated with a more negative frontal-central N400-600 amplitude, while high judgments of learning were associated with a larger frontal-parietal slow wave amplitude. Furthermore, low judgments of learning exhibited greater theta band event-related synchronization (θ-ERS) and beta band event-related desynchronization (β-ERD) during the metacognitive monitoring phase compared to high judgments of learning. Brain-behavior correlations also indicated a relationship between the 600–1000 component and behavioral performance, highlighting differential effects between high and low JOLs when making metacognitive monitoring ratings. These findings extend previous research and suggest that the formation of JOL ratings involves two distinct stages: the first stage involves obtaining retrieval fluency cues (frontal-central N400-600 amplitude), while the second stage involves utilizing these cues for metacognitive monitoring (frontal-parietal slow wave amplitude). Varying item familiarity and degrees of retrieval familiarity contribute to differences in JOL ratings. In summary, this study provides compelling evidence for a two-stage process in metacognitive monitoring ratings from both neurophysiological and brain-behavior correlation perspectives.

Judgments of learning reactively facilitate visual memory by enhancing learning engagement

Judgments of Learning Reactively Improve Memory by Enhancing Learning Engagement and Inducing Elaborative Processing: Evidence from an EEG Study

Judgments of learning reactively affect memory by inducing covert retrieval

Differential Neural Correlates Underlie Judgment of Learning and Subsequent Memory Performance

Making judgments of learning enhances memory by inducing item-specific processing

Do changed learning goals explain why metamemory judgments reactively affect memory?

Metamemory judgments and design effects: Judgment of learning (JOL) reactivity in free recall is affected by study list structure

Evaluating the Judgment of Learning: its Limited Impact and the Power of Retrieval on Inductive Learning

The Rehearsal Effect Of Object-Based Attention On Object Working Memory

Asymmetric Interaction Effects of Information with Varying Priorities in Visual Working Memory

Neural dynamics of metacognitive monitoring: a dual-stage perspective on judgments of learning

Metacognitive judgments can potentiate new learning: The role of covert retrieval

What guides the judgment of learning: Memory or heuristics? An event-related potential study

Metacognitive judgments of prior material facilitate the learning of new material: The forward effect of metacognitive judgments in inductive learning.

The Reactivation of working memory representations affects attentional guidance

The Linear Impact of Visual Working Memory Load on Visual Awareness: Evidence from Motion-Induced Blindness.

Reactivation-induced Memory Integration Prevents Proactive Interference in Perceptual Learning

Integrating educational knowledge: reactivation of prior knowledge during educational learning enhances memory integration

Object-based attention in retaining binding in working memory: Influence of activation states of working memory

Visual Working-Memory Capacity Load Does Not Modulate Distractor Processing

The disconnect between metamemory and memory for emotional images