Nitrogen Removal Capacity and Carbon Demand Requirements of Partial Denitrification/Anammox MBBR and IFAS Processes

Macmanus Justin,Chenghua Long,Stephanie Klaus,Michael Parsons,Kartik Chandran,Haydee De Clippeleir,Charles Bott
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/wer.10766
2022-07-17
Water Environment Research
Abstract:A pilot study was conducted to investigate the carbon demand requirements and nitrogen removal capabilities of two mainstream partial denitrification/anammox (PdNA) processes: a two‐zone, moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR) process and an integrated fixed‐film activated sludge (IFAS) process. The first MBBR zone conducted PdNA, while the second operated as an anammox zone. Operation of the IFAS process was conducted in two phases. The first phase of operation involved minor external carbon addition, while the second phase of operation involved controlled external carbon addition. The MBBR process produced an average effluent TIN concentration and COD/TIN ratio of 2.81 ± 1.21 mg/L and 2.42 ± 0.77 g/g. The average effluent TIN concentrations and COD/TIN ratios for the IFAS process were 4.07 ± 1.66 mg/L and 1.08 ± 0.38 g/g during phase 1 and 3.30 ± 0.96 mg/L and 2.18 ± 0.99 g/g during phase 2. Despite having relatively low and unstable partial denitrification (PdN) efficiencies, both mainstream PdNA processes exhibited low effluent TIN concentrations and carbon requirements compared to nitrification/denitrification. Successful operation of the PdNA IFAS process indicates that mainstream PdNA can be implemented with minimal capital costs in a WWRF's second anoxic zone.
environmental sciences,engineering, environmental,water resources,limnology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?