Abstract:Infigratinib (INF) is a fibroblast growth factor receptor inhibitor that was recently United States Food and Drug Administration-approved for the treatment of advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma. We previously established that INF inhibited and inactivated cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4). Here, in a follow up to our previous study, we identified for the first time that INF also elicited potent competitive inhibition and mechanism-based inactivation of CYP2J2 with kinetic parameters K i , K I , k inact , and a partition ratio of 1.94 μ M, 0.10 μ M, 0.026 minute –1 , and ~3, respectively, when rivaroxaban was harnessed as the probe substrate. Inactivation was revealed to exhibit cofactor-dependency and was attenuated by an alternative substrate (astemizole) and direct inhibitor (nilotinib) of CYP2J2. Additionally, the nature of inactivation was unlikely to be pseudo-irreversible and instead arose from covalent modification due to the lack of substantial enzyme activity recovery after dialysis and chemical oxidation, as well as the lack of a resolvable Soret band in spectral scans. Glutathione trapping confirmed that the identity of the putative reactive intermediate implicated in the covalent inactivation of both CYP2J2 and CYP3A4 was identical and likely attributable to an electrophilic p -benzoquinonediimine intermediate of INF. Finally, mechanistic static modeling revealed that by integrating the previously arcane inhibition and inactivation kinetic parameters of CYP2J2-mediated rivaroxaban hydroxylation by INF illuminated in this work, together with those previously documented for CYP3A4, a 49% increase in the systemic exposure of rivaroxaban was projected. Our modeling results predicted a potential risk of metabolic drug-drug interactions between the clinically relevant combination of rivaroxaban and INF in the setting of cancer. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT This study reported that INF elicits potent reversible inhibition and mechanism-based inactivation of CYP2J2. Furthermore, static modelling predicted that its coadministration with the direct oral anticoagulant rivaroxaban may potentially culminate in a metabolic drug-drug interaction (DDI) leading to an increased risk of major bleeding. As rivaroxaban is steadily gaining prominence as the anticoagulant of choice in the treatment of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism, the DDI projections reported here are clinically relevant and warrant further investigation via physiologically based pharmacokinetic modelling and simulation.

Risk assessment and molecular mechanism study of drug-drug interactions between rivaroxaban and tyrosine kinase inhibitors mediated by CYP2J2/3A4 and BCRP/P-gp

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors and direct oral anticoagulants: In vitro evaluation of drug–drug interaction mediated by P‐glycoprotein

Identification of Infigratinib as a Potent Reversible Inhibitor and Mechanism-Based Inactivator of CYP2J2: Nascent Evidence for a Potential In Vivo Metabolic Drug-Drug Interaction with Rivaroxaban

Differential Effects of Ketoconazole, Fluconazole, and Itraconazole on the Pharmacokinetics of Pyrotinib in Vitro and in Vivo

In Vitro Assessment of Inhibitory Effects of Kinase Inhibitors on CYP2C9, 3A and 1A2: Prediction of Drug-Drug Interaction Risk with Warfarin and Direct Oral Anticoagulants

Application of Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling to the Prediction of Drug-Drug and Drug-Disease Interactions for Rivaroxaban

Identifying the Dominant Contribution of Human Cytochrome P450 2J2 to the Metabolism of Rivaroxaban, an Oral Anticoagulant

Effect of Diosmin on Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Rivaroxaban in Rats

Clinical significance of the rivaroxaban–dronedarone interaction: insights from physiologically based pharmacokinetic modelling

Predicting Drug-Drug Interactions with Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic Modelling and Optimal Dosing of Apixaban and Rivaroxaban with Dronedarone Co-Administration

Construction of cytochrome P450 3A and P-glycoprotein knockout rats with application in rivaroxaban-verapamil interactions

Letter to the editor regarding the paper by A. Boileve et al.: Safety of direct oral anticoagulants in patients with advanced solid tumors receiving anti‐VEGF agents: a retrospective study

Anlotinib and Fruquintinib Co-Administrated with Warfarin Increases the Risk of Bleeding: Studied from Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Perspectives

Predicting drug-drug interaction with physiologically based pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modelling and optimal dosing of apixaban and rivaroxaban with dronedarone co-administration

Predicting Drug-Drug Interaction with Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Modelling and Optimal Dosing of Oral Anti-Coagulants with Dronedarone Co-Administration

In vitro assessment of P‐gp and BCRP transporter‐mediated drug–drug interactions of riociguat with direct oral anticoagulants

The Pharmacogenetic Variability Associated with the Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Rivaroxaban in Healthy Chinese Subjects: A National Multicenter Exploratory Study

In vitro assessment of the risk of ABCB1-mediated drug-drug interaction between rivaroxaban and tacrolimus in human embryonic kidney 293 recombinant cell lines

Effect of ABCB1 Gene Carriage and Drug-Drug Interactions on Apixaban and Rivaroxaban Pharmacokinetics and Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Deep Vein Thrombosis

Comparison of Rivaroxaban Mono-Therapy and Standard-Therapy Adjusted by CYP2C9 and VKORC1 Genotypes in Symptomatic Pulmonary Embolism.

Effects of CYP3A inhibitors ketoconazole, voriconazole, and itraconazole on the pharmacokinetics of sunitinib and its main metabolite in rats