Abstract:Background Students' recognition beliefs have emerged as one of the most important components of engineering role identity development for early‐career undergraduate students. Recognition beliefs are students' perceptions of how meaningful others, such as peers, instructors, and family, see them as engineers. However, little work has investigated the experiences that facilitate recognition beliefs, particularly across the intersections of race, ethnicity, and gender. Investigation of these experiences provides ways to understand how recognition may be supported in engineering environments and how White and masculine norms in engineering can shape marginalized students' experiences. Purpose We examined how specific experiences theorized to promote recognition are related to recognition beliefs for students at the intersections of race, ethnicity, and gender. Based on self‐reported demographics, we created 10 groups, including Asian, Black, Latino and Hispanic, Indigenous, and White cisgender men and Asian, Black, Latinè/x/a/o and Hispanic, Indigenous, and White ciswomen, trans, and non‐binary individuals. This article describes the patterns within each intersectional group rather than drawing comparisons across the groups, which can perpetuate raced and gendered stereotypes. Methods The data came from a survey distributed in Fall 2017 (n = 2316). Ten multiple regression models were used to understand the recognition experiences that influenced students' recognition beliefs by intersectional group. Results There is no one‐size‐fits‐all approach to developing students' recognition beliefs. For example, family members referring to the student as an engineer are positively related to recognition beliefs for Asian, Black, Latino and Hispanic, and White cisgender men. Friends seeing Asian and White marginalized gender students as an engineer is predictive of recognition beliefs. Other recognition experiences, such as receiving compliments from an engineering instructor or peer about their engineering design and contributions to the team, do not influence the recognition beliefs of these early‐career engineering students. Conclusion This article emphasizes the need to draw on multiple experiences to support the equitable development of early‐career engineers across race, ethnicity, and gender, and reveals patterns for recognition that may support future scholarship on effective classroom practices for recognition.

Multirater Feedback of Leadership of Underrepresented Groups in a Civil Engineering Capstone Design Course

Effects of a first-year undergraduate engineering design course: survey study of implications for student self-efficacy and professional skills, with focus on gender/sex and race/ethnicity

Introductory physics students' recognition of strong peers: Gender and racial/ethnic bias differ by course level and context

Exploring experiences that foster recognition in engineering across race and gender

The Role of Contextual Variables and Structural Diversity on College Students' Engineering Self-Efficacy

Is Carla grumpy? Analysis of peer evaluations to explore microaggressions and other marginalizing behaviors in engineering student teams

Educating Engineering Students to Address Bias and Discrimination Within Their Project Teams

Creating an Instrument to Measure Leadership, Change, and Synthesis in Engineering Undergraduates

Group diversity, diversity beliefs, and group processes in a design course for engineering students

Instructor facilitation mediates students' negative perceptions of active learning instruction

Diversity of undergraduates in STEM courses: individual and demographic differences in changes in self-efficacy, epistemic beliefs, and intrapersonal attribute profiles

First-Year Design Projects and Student Perceptions of the Role of an Engineer

Understanding the relationship between idea contributions and idea enactments in student design teams: A social network analysis approach

Zooming Out from the Struggling Individual Student: An Account of the Cultural Construction of Engineering Ability in an Undergraduate Programming Class

Eurocentric epistemologies in engineering: Manifestations in first‐year student design teams and consequences for student learning

Fundamentals of leadership development: a randomized pilot study to evaluate implementation of a leadership curriculum for diversity, equity, and inclusion

Identifying systemic inequity in higher education and opportunities for improvement

Student social self-efficacy, leadership status, and academic performance in collaborative learning environments

Inclusive excellence through digital learning: an undergraduate research experience to pilot cross-institutional collaboration between a historically black university and a predominantly white institution

Inequity exemplified by underrepresented minority students receiving lower grades and having higher rates of attrition across STEM disciplines

Leveraging faculty knowledge, experience, and training for leadership education in engineering undergraduate curricula