Abstract:Purpose Existing studies mostly rely on the static characteristics of team members, and there is still a lack of empirical investigation on how entrepreneurial team members make decisions through dynamic team process and how team members’ cognition influences team decision-making. The purpose of this study is to validate how entrepreneurial team heterogeneity affects team decision-making performance from the perspective of dynamic team process. Design/methodology/approach Drawing on the theory of input-process-output model, this study proposed and examined the mediating role of team interaction as well as the moderating role of proactive socialization tactics in the relationship between entrepreneurial team heterogeneity and decision-making performance. Based on a sample of 162 entrepreneurial teams that include pairing superiors and subordinates, hierarchical regressions and moderated mediation tests were used to test the hypotheses. Findings The research results show that the heterogeneity of entrepreneurial teams is positively correlated with both team interaction and decision-making performance. Team interaction plays a mediating role between entrepreneurial team heterogeneity and decision-making performance; information seeking of proactive socialization tactics moderates the impact of entrepreneurial team heterogeneity on team interaction. Originality/value Contributing to the literature on entrepreneurial team decision-making performance, this study identifies that proactive socialization tactics with a high level of information seeking can help entrepreneurial team members respond to environmental and organizational changes more effectively during team development and increase the effectiveness of team interaction. This finding helps us better understand the mechanism and context under which entrepreneurial heterogeneity may enhance the team’s decision-making performance.

Transactive memory system and entrepreneurial team performance: the impact of ability to improvise and market competition

Explorative and Exploitative Improvisation: How Founding Teams Response to Uncertainty

How Entrepreneurs’zhong-Yongthinking Improves New Venture Performance

Linking Entrepreneurs' Felt Responsibility to Ventures' Innovation Performance: the Roles of External Learning and Shared Vision.

A Contextualized Transactive Memory System View on How Founding Teams Respond to Surprises: Evidence from China

The Research of the Relationship Between Team Improvisation and Innovation Performance Dong

Team Learning, Transactive Memory System and Team Performance: A Longitudinal Study Based on the IMOI Approach

The effect of transactive memory system on team creativity and its acting mechanism:Taking exploitative learning and explorative learning as mediators

Impact Mechanism of Temporal Diversity on Team Performance

Explorations Of Improvisational Learning In Innovation

When Do Close Ties to Service Intermediaries Lead to Entrepreneurial Improvisation?

Team Leader’s Conflict Management Styles and Innovation Performance in Entrepreneurial Teams

Empirical Analysis on Relationship between Transactive Memory System and Team Task,Member Heterogeneity and Team Performance

Explorations Of Improvisation In Innovation As An Organizational Learning Mode

Transformational Leadership and Team Transactive Memory System:Mediating Roles of Team Trust and Team Reflexivity

Entrepreneurs' Felt Responsibility for Constructive Change and Entrepreneurial Performance: A Moderated Mediation Model of Technology Action and Market Orientation.

Influence of Member-team Matching and Team Climate to Entrepreneurial Team Performance

"Team As Innovation System Revisited: A Cross-Level Model of Proactivity, Knowledge Sharing and TMS"

Many roads lead to Rome: How improvisation and absorptive capacity affect entrepreneurial orientation and new venture performance relationship

The Effect Of Transactive Memory System On Team Performance: The Mediating Role Of Knowledge Sharing And The Moderating Role Of Task Complex

How entrepreneurial team heterogeneity impacts decision-making performance? An input-process-output approach