International consensus recommendations for management of New Onset Refractory Status Epilepticus (NORSE) including Febrile Infection‐Related Epilepsy Syndrome (FIRES): Summary and Clinical Tools

Ronny Wickstrom,Olga Taraschenko,Robertino Dilena,Eric T. Payne,Nicola Specchio,Rima Nabbout,Sookyong Koh,Nicolas Gaspard,Lawrence J. Hirsch,Stephane Auvin,Andreas van Baalen,Ettore Beghi,Susanne M Benseler,Peter Bergin,Tom Bleck,Andreas Brunklaus,Roberto H Caraballo,Mackenzie Cervenka,Daniel Costello,Frank Drislane,Raquel Farias‐Moeller,William Gallantine,Emily J. Gilmore,Teneille Gofton,Maria Angeles Perez Jimenez,Sara Hocker,Marios Kaliakatsos,Marissa Kellogg,Jong Woo Lee,Tobias Loddenkemper,Stefano Meletti,Masashi Mizugushi,Eyal Muscal,James J. Riviello,Eric S. Rosenthal,Andrea O Rossetti,Stefan Ruegg,Rana Said,Claudine Sculier,Sarah Schmitt,Stephan Schuele,Coral Stredny,Eugen Trinka,Mark Wainwright,Stephen VanHaerents,Elisabeth Wells,Elaine Wirrell,Sameer M Zuberi,The International NORSE Consensus Group
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.17391
IF: 6.74
2022-08-14
Epilepsia
Abstract:Objective To develop consensus‐based recommendations for the management of adult and pediatric patients with NORSE/FIRES based on best available evidence and expert opinion. Methods The Delphi methodology was followed. A facilitator group of 9 experts was established, who defined the scope, users and suggestions for recommendations. Following a review of the current literature, recommendation statements concerning diagnosis, treatment and research directions were generated which were then voted on a scale of 1 (strongly disagree) to 9 (strongly agree) by a panel of 48 experts in the field. Consensus that a statement was appropriate was reached if the median score was greater than or equal to 7, and inappropriate if the median score was less than or equal to 3. Results Overall, 85 recommendation statements achieved consensus. The recommendations are divided into five sections: 1) disease characteristics, 2) diagnostic testing and sampling, 3) acute treatment, 4) treatment in the post‐acute phase, and 5) research, registries and future directions in NORSE/FIRES. These are summarized in this article along with two practical clinical flowsheets: one for diagnosis and evaluation and one for acute treatment. A corresponding evidence‐based analysis of all 85 recommendations alongside responses by the Delphi panel is presented in a companion article. Significance The recommendations generated by this consensus can be used as a guide for the diagnosis, evaluation, and management of patients with NORSE/FIRES, and for planning of future research.
clinical neurology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?