Machine Learning Predictive Model for Septic Shock in Acute Pancreatitis with Sepsis
Yiqin Xia,Hongyu Long,Qiang Lai,Yiwu Zhou
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/jir.s441591
IF: 4.5
2024-03-05
Journal of Inflammation Research
Abstract:Yiqin Xia, 1– 3 Hongyu Long, 4 Qiang Lai, 1– 3 Yiwu Zhou 1– 3 1 Emergency Department, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China; 2 Laboratory of Emergency Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China; 3 Disaster Medical Center, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China; 4 Department of Critical Care Medicine, Chengdu First People's Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China Correspondence: Yiwu Zhou, Emergency Department, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China, Email Objective: Acute pancreatitis (AP) progresses to septic shock can be fatal. Early identification of high-risk patients and timely intervention can prevent and interrupt septic shock. By analyzing the clinical characteristics of AP with sepsis, this study uses machine learning (ML) to build a model for early prediction of septic shock within 28 days of admission, which guided emergency physicians in resource allocation and medical decision-making. Methods: This retrospective cohort study collected data from the emergency departments (EDs) of three tertiary care hospitals in China. The dataset was randomly divided into a training dataset (70%) and a testing dataset (30%). Ten ML classifiers were utilized to analyze characteristics of AP with sepsis in the training dataset upon admission. Results were evaluated through cross-validation analysis. The optimal model was then tested on the testing dataset without any parameter modifications. The ML model was evaluated using the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) and compared to scoring systems through the DeLong test. Results: A total of 604 AP patients with sepsis were included in this study. The auto-encoder (AE) model based on mean normalization, Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC), and recursive feature elimination (RFE) selection, achieved the highest Area Under the Curve (AUC) on the validation dataset (AUC 0.900, accuracy 0.868), with the AUC of 0.879 and accuracy of 0.790 on the testing dataset. Compared to the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (AUC 0.741), quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (AUC 0.727), Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (AUC 0.778), and Bedside Index of Severity in Acute Pancreatitis (AUC 0.691), the AE model showed superior performance. Conclusion: The AE model outperforms traditional scoring systems in predicting septic shock in AP patients with sepsis within 28 days of admission. This assists emergency physicians in identifying high-risk patients early and making timely medical decisions. Keywords: machine learning, acute pancreatitis, sepsis, septic shock Acute pancreatitis (AP) complicated by sepsis is a complex clinical condition often associated with high clinical instability and risks. Up to 40–70% of AP patients will develop infections related to pancreatitis in the later stages or progress to sepsis in severe cases, 1,2 which is associated with higher mortality rates and adverse prognosis, 3 especially when patients progress to septic shock, the mortality rate can reach up to 80%. 4 Early admission to Intensive Care Unit (ICU) treatment can more effectively manage high-risk patients, halt the progression of sepsis, and thereby improve the clinical prognosis of patients. 5 Currently, the early identification of high-risk patients who may progress to septic shock remains a challenging task. Clinicians rely on symptoms, signs, and clinical examinations for initial assessments. Existing scoring systems such as the Bedside Index for Severity in Acute Pancreatitis (BISAP) 6,7 can effectively predict the severity and prognosis of AP. Other scoring systems such as the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II, 8 Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA), 9 and quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) should be used for risk stratification and consideration of sepsis in emergency department patients. 10 However, these scoring systems have shown limited effectiveness in predicting septic shock. 11–14 Their effectiveness in identifying sepsis-complicated AP and predicting the occurrence of septic shock remains uncertain, and there are no related studies. Machine learning (ML) techniques have shown significant potential in the medical field, particularly in early disease identification and prediction. 15–18 The study indicates that using artificial intelligence algorithms for septic shock risk identification and diagnosis can improve the early detection rate of septic shock b -Abstract Truncated-
immunology