Cell wall ester modifications and volatile emission signatures of plant response to abiotic stress

Kolby J Jardine,Rebecca A Dewhirst,Suman Som,Joseph Lei,Eliana Tucker,Robert P Young,Miguel Portillo‐Estrada,Yu Gao,Luping Su,Silvano Fares,Cristina Castanha,Henrik V. Scheller,Jenny C Mortimer

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.14464

2022-10-14

Abstract:Growth suppression and defense signaling are simultaneous strategies that plants invoke to respond to abiotic stress. Here, we show that the drought stress response of poplar trees (Populus trichocarpa) is initiated by a suppression in cell wall derived methanol (MeOH) emissions and activation of acetic acid (AA) fermentation defenses. Temperature sensitive emissions dominated by MeOH (AA/MeOH < 30%) were observed from physiologically active leaves, branches, detached stems, leaf cell wall isolations, and whole ecosystems. In contrast, drought treatment resulted in a suppression of MeOH emissions and strong enhancement in AA emissions together with volatiles acetaldehyde, ethanol, and acetone. These drought‐induced changes coincided with a reduction in stomatal conductance, photosynthesis, transpiration, and leaf water potential. The strong enhancement in AA/MeOH emission ratios during drought (400‐3,500%) was associated with an increase in acetate content of whole leaf cell walls, which became significantly 13C2‐labeled following the delivery of 13C2‐acetate via the transpiration stream. The results are consistent with both enzymatic and non‐enzymatic MeOH and AA production at high temperature in hydrated tissues associated with accelerated primary cell wall growth processes, which are downregulated during drought. While the metabolic source(s) require further investigation, the observations are consistent with drought‐induced activation of aerobic fermentation driving high rates of foliar AA emissions and enhancements in leaf cell wall O‐acetylation. We suggest that atmospheric AA/MeOH emission ratios could be useful as a highly sensitive signal in studies investigating environmental and biological factors influencing growth‐defense trade‐offs in plants and ecosystems.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.