Abstract:Abstract. The MOSAiC (Multidisciplinary drifting Observatory for the Study of Arctic Climate) expedition was the largest Arctic field campaign ever conducted. MOSAiC offered the unique opportunity to monitor and characterize aerosols and clouds with high vertical resolution up to 30 km height at latitudes from 80 to 90∘ N over an entire year (October 2019 to September 2020). Without a clear knowledge of the complex aerosol layering, vertical structures, and dominant aerosol types and their impact on cloud formation, a full understanding of the meteorological processes in the Arctic, and thus advanced climate change research, is impossible. Widespread ground-based in situ observations in the Arctic are insufficient to provide these required aerosol and cloud data. In this article, a summary of our MOSAiC observations of tropospheric aerosol profiles with a state-of-the-art multiwavelength polarization Raman lidar aboard the icebreaker Polarstern is presented. Particle optical properties, i.e., light-extinction profiles and aerosol optical thickness (AOT), and estimates of cloud-relevant aerosol properties such as the number concentration of cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) and ice-nucleating particles (INPs) are discussed, separately for the lowest part of the troposphere (atmospheric boundary layer, ABL), within the lower free troposphere (around 2000 m height), and at the cirrus level close to the tropopause. In situ observations of the particle number concentration and INPs aboard Polarstern are included in the study. A strong decrease in the aerosol amount with height in winter and moderate vertical variations in summer were observed in terms of the particle extinction coefficient. The 532 nm light-extinction values dropped from >50 Mm−1 close to the surface to <5 Mm−1 at 4–6 km height in the winter months. Lofted, aged wildfire smoke layers caused a re-increase in the aerosol concentration towards the tropopause. In summer (June to August 2020), much lower particle extinction coefficients, frequently as low as 1–5 Mm−1, were observed in the ABL. Aerosol removal, controlled by in-cloud and below-cloud scavenging processes (widely suppressed in winter and very efficient in summer) in the lowermost 1–2 km of the atmosphere, seems to be the main reason for the strong differences between winter and summer aerosol conditions. A complete annual cycle of the AOT in the central Arctic could be measured. This is a valuable addition to the summertime observations with the sun photometers of the Arctic Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET). In line with the pronounced annual cycle in the aerosol optical properties, typical CCN number concentrations (0.2 % supersaturation level) ranged from 50–500 cm−3 in winter to 10–100 cm−3 in summer in the ABL. In the lower free troposphere (at 2000 m), however, the CCN level was roughly constant throughout the year, with values mostly from 30 to 100 cm−3. A strong contrast between winter and summer was also given in terms of ABL INPs which control ice production in low-level clouds. While soil dust (from surrounding continents) is probably the main INP type during the autumn, winter, and spring months, local sea spray aerosol (with a biogenic aerosol component) seems to dominate the ice nucleation in the ABL during the summer months (June–August). The strong winter vs. summer contrast in the INP number concentration by roughly 2–3 orders of magnitude in the lower troposphere is, however, mainly caused by the strong cloud temperature contrast. A unique event of the MOSAiC expedition was the occurrence of a long-lasting wildfire smoke layer in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere. Our observations suggest that the smoke particles frequently triggered cirrus formation close to the tropopause from October 2019 to May 2020.

The relation between aerosol vertical distribution and temperature inversions in the Arctic in winter and spring

Vertical structures of temperature inversions and clouds derived from high-resolution radiosonde measurements at Ny-Ålesund, Svalbard

Urban Aerosol Evolution and Particle Formation During Wintertime Temperature Inversions

The covariability between temperature inversions and aerosol vertical distribution over China

Seasonal cycles and long-term trends of arctic tropospheric aerosols based on CALIPSO lidar observations

Pan-Arctic seasonal cycles and long-term trends of aerosol properties from ten observatories

Pan-Arctic seasonal cycles and long-term trends of aerosol properties from 10 observatories

Temperature Inversion and Clouds Over the Arctic Ocean Observed by the 5th Chinese National Arctic Research Expedition

Ground-based remote sensing of aerosol properties using high-resolution infrared emission and lidar observations in the High Arctic

Aerosol characteristics at the three poles of the Earth as characterized by Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observations

Columnar optical-radiative properties and components of aerosols in the Arctic summer from long-term AERONET measurements

Investigation of aerosol effects on the Arctic surface temperature during the diurnal cycle: part 1 – total aerosol effect

The Shallowing Surface Temperature Inversions in the Arctic

New insights into aerosol and climate in the Arctic

Intra-annual Variations of Regional Aerosol Optical Depth, Vertical Distribution, and Particle Types from Multiple Satellite and Ground-Based Observational Datasets

Vertical-distribution Characteristics of Atmospheric Aerosols under Different Thermodynamic Conditions in Beijing

Annual cycle of aerosol properties over the central Arctic during MOSAiC 2019–2020 – light-extinction, CCN, and INP levels from the boundary layer to the tropopause

Aerosols in the central Arctic cryosphere: satellite and model integrated insights during Arctic spring and summer

Characterization of the aerosol vertical distributions and their impacts on warm clouds based on multi-year ARM observations

Vertical distribution of the Asian tropopause aerosols detected by CALIPSO

Vertical distributions of aerosols under different weather conditions: Analysis of in-situ aircraft measurements in Beijing, China