Abstract:<h3 class="Heading">Background</h3><p class="Para">Economic evaluation can inform whether strategies designed to improve the quality of health care delivery and the uptake of evidence-based practices represent a cost-effective use of limited resources. We report a systematic review and critical appraisal of the application of health economic methods in improvement/implementation research.</p><h3 class="Heading">Method</h3><p class="Para">A systematic literature search identified 1668 papers across the Agris, Embase, Global Health, HMIC, PsycINFO, Social Policy and Practice, MEDLINE and EconLit databases between 2004 and 2016. s were screened in Rayyan database, and key data extracted into Microsoft Excel. Evidence was critically appraised using the Quality of Health Economic Studies (QHES) framework.</p><h3 class="Heading">Results</h3><p class="Para">Thirty studies were included—all health economic studies that included implementation or improvement as a part of the evaluation. Studies were conducted mostly in Europe (62%) or North America (23%) and were largely hospital-based (70%). The field was split between improvement (<em class="EmphasisTypeItalic">N</em> = 16) and implementation (<em class="EmphasisTypeItalic">N</em> = 14) studies. The most common intervention evaluated (43%) was staffing reconfiguration, specifically changing from physician-led to nurse-led care delivery. Most studies (<em class="EmphasisTypeItalic">N</em> = 19) were ex-post economic evaluations carried out empirically—of those, 17 were cost effectiveness analyses. We found four cost utility analyses that used economic modelling rather than empirical methods. Two cost-consequence analyses were also found. Specific implementation costs considered included costs associated with staff training in new care delivery pathways, the impacts of new processes on patient and carer costs and the costs of developing new care processes/pathways. Over half (55%) of the included studies were rated 'good' on QHES. Study quality was boosted through inclusion of appropriate comparators and reporting of incremental analysis (where relevant); and diminished through use of post-hoc subgroup analysis, limited reporting of the handling of uncertainty and justification for choice of discount rates.</p><h3 class="Heading">Conclusions</h3><p class="Para">The quantity of published economic evaluations applied to the field of improvement and implementation research remains modest; however, quality is overall good. Implementation and improvement scientists should work closely with health economists to consider costs associated with improvement interventions and their associated implementation strategies. We offer a set of concrete recommendations to facilitate this endeavour.</p>

Systematic Review and Quality Assessment of Health Economic Evaluation Studies (2007–2019) Conducted in South Korea

Role of economic evidence in coverage decision-making in South Korea

Application of pharmacoeconomic evaluation in reimbursement decision-making in South Korea

Improving Patient Access to New Drugs in South Korea: Evaluation of the National Drug Formulary System

Evaluation and Characterization of Health Economics and Outcomes Research in SAARC Nations

Use of health economic evaluation in the implementation and improvement science fields—a systematic literature review

National Healthcare Economic Evaluation Guidelines: A Cross-Country Comparison

An Introduction to the Main Types of Economic Evaluations Used for Informing Priority Setting and Resource Allocation in Healthcare: Key Features, Uses, and Limitations

A systematic review and quality assessment of economic evaluations of kidney replacement therapies in end-stage kidney disease

Evaluation of changes in the clinical benefits of oncology drugs over time following reimbursement using the ASCO-VF and the ESMO-MCBS

An Industry Survey on Unmet Needs in South Korea's New Drug Listing System

Economic evaluation of pharmacy services: a systematic review of the literature (2016–2020)

PD12 Quality Assessment of Health Economic Evaluation on Screening Programs from China

A Systematic Review of Spatial and Spatio-temporal Analyses in Public Health Research in Korea

Systematic review of publications on economic evaluations of caries prevention programs

Effects of a mandatory DRG payment system in South Korea: Analysis of multi-year nationwide hospital claims data

Assessment of the quality of pharmacoeconomic evaluation literature in China

The Quality of Published Health Economic Evaluations on Screening Programs in China: a Systematic Review and Quantitative Appraisal

Systematic review of economic evaluations for paediatric pulmonary diseases

Modelling Methods of Economic Evaluations of HIV Testing Strategies in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Systematic Review

Unintended consequences of healthcare reform in South Korea: evidence from a regression discontinuity in time design