Family-GWAS reveals effects of environment and mating on genetic associations
Tammy Tan,Hariharan Jayashankar,Junming Guan,Seyed Moeen Nehzati,Mahdi Mir,Michael Bennett,Esben Agerbo,Rafael Ahlskog,Ville Pinto de Andrade Anapaz,Bjorn Olav Asvold,Stefania Benonisdottir,Laxmi Bhatta,Dorret I. Boomsma,Ben Brumpton,Archie Campbell,Christopher F. Chabris,Rosa Cheesman,Zhengming Chen,China Kadoorie Biobank Collaborative Group,Eco de Geus,Erik A. Ehli,Abdelrahman G. Elnahas,Estonian Biobank Research Team,Finngen Authors,Andrea Ganna,Alexandros Giannelis,Liisa Hakaste,Ailin Falkmo Hansen,Alexandra Havdahl,Caroline Hayward,Jouke-Jan Hottenga,Mikkel Aagaard Houmark,Kristian Hveem,Jaakko Kaprio,Arnulf Langhammer,Antti Latvala,James J. Lee,Mikko Lehtovirta,Liming Li,LifeLines Cohort Study,Kuang Lin,Richard Karlsson Linner,Stefano Lombardi,Nicholas G. Martin,Matt McGue,Sarah E. Medland,Andres Metspalu,Brittany L. Mitchell,Guiyan Ni,Ilja M. Nolte,Matthew T. Oetjens Oetjens,Sven Oskarsson,Teemu Palviainen,Rashmi B. Prasad,Anu Reigo,Kadri Reis,Julia Sidorenko,Karri Silventoinen,Harold Snieder,Tiinamaija Tuomi,Bjarni J. Vilhjalmsson,Robin G. Walters,Emily A. Willoughby,Bendik S. Winsvold,Eivind Ystrom,Jonathan Flint,Loic Yengo,Peter M. Visscher,Augustine Kong,Elliot M. Tucker-Drob,Richard Border,David Cesarini,Patrick Turley,Aysu Okbay,Daniel J. Benjamin,Alexander Strudwick Young
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.01.24314703
2024-10-04
Abstract:Genome–wide association studies (GWAS) have discovered thousands of replicable genetic associations, guiding drug target discovery and powering genetic prediction of human phenotypes and diseases. However, genetic associations can be affected by gene–environment correlations and non–random mating, which can lead to biased inferences in downstream analyses. Family–based GWAS (FGWAS) uses the natural experiment of random assignment of genotype within families to separate out the contribution of direct genetic effects (DGEs) — causal effects of alleles in an individual on an individual — from other factors contributing to genetic associations. Here, we report results from an FGWAS meta–analysis of 34 phenotypes from 17 cohorts. We found evidence that factors uncorrelated with DGEs make substantial contributions to genetic associations for 27 phenotypes, with population stratification confounding — a form of gene–environment correlation — likely the major cause. By estimating SNP heritability and genetic correlations using DGEs, we found evidence that assortative mating has led to overestimation of SNP heritability for 5 phenotypes and overestimation of the degree of shared genetic effects (pleiotropy) between 22 pairs of phenotypes. Polygenic predictors constructed from DGEs are particularly useful for studying natural selection, assortative mating, and indirect genetic effects (effects of relatives′ genes mediated through the family environment). We validate our meta–analysis results by predicting phenotypes in hold–out samples using polygenic predictors constructed from DGEs, achieving statistically significant out–of–sample prediction for 24 phenotypes with little attenuation of predictive power within–families. We provide FGWAS summary statistics for 34 phenotypes that can be used for downstream analyses. Our study provides both a template for performing FGWAS and an argument for its value for debiasing inferences and understanding the impact of environment and mating patterns.