Changes in skin blood flow, respiration and blood pressure in participants reporting motion sickness during sinusoidal galvanic vestibular stimulation

Anadil Javaid,Houda Chouhna,Ben Varghese,Elie Hammam,Vaughan G. Macefield,Vaughan G Macefield
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1113/EP087385
2019-11-25
Experimental Physiology
Abstract:New Findings What is the central question of the study? We have previously shown that sinusoidal galvanic vestibular stimulation (sGVS) induces greater modulation of skin sympathetic nerve activity (SSNA), but not muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA), in participants who report nausea during simulated motion, but the effects on skin blood flow and blood pressure are unknown. What is the main finding and its importance? Nausea was associated with a greater increase in skin blood flow, and a progressive reduction in SSNA, during vestibular stimulation but no changes in MSNA. This emphasises the differential changes in sympathetic outflow to different tissues during nausea. Background : We tested the hypothesis that galvanic vestibular stimulation, which produces illusions of side‐to‐side swaying, causes a greater reduction in skin blood flow in participants who report stimulation‐induced nausea. Methods : A retrospective analysis was performed on data obtained in 30 participants. Bipolar sinusoidal galvanic vestibular stimulation (sGVS) was applied across the mastoid processes (±2 mA, 0.08 Hz) for 21 minutes. ECG, continuous blood pressure, respiration and skin blood flow were recorded. Muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) was recorded in 17 participants and skin sympathetic nerve activity (SSNA) in 12. Results : Ten participants reported motion sickness, while 20 did not. Both groups showed an initial fall in skin blood flow (finger) during sGVS, followed by a sustained increase and a subsequent return towards baseline levels throughout the stimulation; the increase was higher in the nausea group. The increase fits with the progressive fall in SSNA observed in the nausea group. Mean blood pressure was significantly lower in the nausea group, and showed a much larger increase at the onset of sGVS than in the no‐nausea group. Moreover, respiratory rate was higher at the outset for the nausea group, falling progressively during sGVS, while respiratory rate remained constant in the no‐nausea group. Heart rate was more labile in the nausea group, showing a sustained increase towards the end of stimulation. Conclusions : We have shown that several autonomic parameters change during the nausea induced by vestibular stimulation, but a sustained decrease in skin blood flow is not a hallmark of incipient motion sickness. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved
physiology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?