The energetic costs of sub‐lethal helminth parasites in mammals: a meta‐analysis

Kyle M. Shanebeck,Anne A. Besson,Clement Lagrue,Stephanie J. Green

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12867

IF: 14.35

2022-06-10

Biological Reviews

Abstract:Parasites, by definition, have a negative effect on their host. However, in wild mammal health and conservation research, sub‐lethal infections are commonly assumed to have negligible health effects unless parasites are present in overwhelming numbers. Here, we propose a definition for host health in mammals that includes sub‐lethal effects of parasites on the host's capacity to adapt to the environment and maintain homeostasis. We synthesized the growing number of studies on helminth parasites in mammals to assess evidence for the relative magnitude of sub‐lethal effects of infection across mammal taxa based on this expanded definition. Specifically, we develop and apply a framework for organizing disparate metrics of parasite effects on host health and body condition according to their impact on an animal's energetic condition, defined as the energetic burden of pathogens on host physiological and behavioural functions that relate directly to fitness. Applying this framework within a global meta‐analysis of helminth parasites in wild, laboratory and domestic mammal hosts produced 142 peer‐reviewed studies documenting 599 infection‐condition effects. Analysing these data within a multiple working hypotheses framework allowed us to evaluate the relative weighted contribution of methodological (study design, sampling protocol, parasite quantification methods) and biological (phylogenetic relationships and host/parasite life history) moderators to variation in the magnitude of health effects. We found consistently strong negative effects of infection on host energetic condition across taxonomic groups, with unusually low heterogeneity in effect sizes when compared with other ecological meta‐analyses. Observed effect size was significantly lower within cross‐sectional studies (i.e. observational studies that investigated a sub‐set of a population at a single point in time), the most prevalent methodology. Furthermore, opportunistic sampling led to a weaker negative effect compared to proactive sampling. In the model of host taxonomic group, the effect of infection on energetic condition in carnivores was not significant. However, when sampling method was included, it explained substantial inter‐study variance; proactive sampling showing a strongly significant negative effect while opportunistic sampling detected only a weak, non‐significant effect. This may partly underlie previous assumptions that sub‐lethal parasites do not have significant effects on host health. We recommend future studies adopt energetic condition as the framework for assessing parasite effects on wildlife health and provide guidelines for the selection of research protocols, health proxies, and relating infection to fitness.

biology