Abstract:The processing of the retrospective data pool for ophthalmology holds huge potential, especially for the research sector. "Big Data" enables medical science to draw conclusions for the future from historical data. Based on the evaluation of such data, algorithms could be trained, for instance, that are capable of making decisions with the help of artificial intelligence. As a result, the medical decision-making process on certain issues could be accelerated, enriched in qualitative and quantitative terms, or even completely be taken over. Ophthalmology is a rapidly evolving field. Due to the multitude of partly automated medical imaging technologies and the predestined accessibility of the eye for such technologies, ophthalmology, similarly to radiology or dermatology, is well suited for artificial intelligence-assisted image data analysis and the frequently associated initiation of diagnosis and therapy. Meanwhile, numerous studies exist based on AI-assisted image data analysis of ophthalmological image data. To the extent that the algorithms filter out results from the data pools by means of calculation rules and are even capable of making independent decisions on the basis of decision trees, the enormous benefit and, simultaneously, the profit for scientific research is quite obvious. Accordingly, it would be desirable to have unrestricted and comprehensive possibility of corresponding data processing of these health data for ophthalmological research. In spite of the potential for ophthalmology, for which there is only fragmentary evidence, the question of practical feasibility arises. In particular, the legal requirements and limits of European and national data protection law must be taken into account, prior to any unreflected processing of personal (health) data. Only by doing so can we circumvent existing obstacles and pitfalls, which can lead to severe fines. Most important are to date the requirements of two legal texts: The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the Federal Data Protection Act (BDSG). This article provides an overview of the relevant legal requirements applicable in the field of ophthalmology and highlights the major pitfalls and implementation requirements.

Towards effective data sharing in ophthalmology: data standardization and data privacy

Privacy preserving technology in ophthalmology

A Clinician's Guide to Sharing Data for AI in Ophthalmology

Towards Standardizing Ophthalmic Data for Seamless Interoperability in Eye Care

Implementation and Execution of Big Data-based Studies in Ophthalmology within the Framework of the GDPR

Big data in corneal diseases and cataract: Current applications and future directions

Research Trends and Hotspots of Big Data in Ophthalmology: A Bibliometric Analysis and Visualization

Big data and electronic health records for glaucoma research

Privacy-Preserving in Medical Image Analysis: A Review of Methods and Applications

Safeguarding Patient Confidentiality in Telemedicine: A Systematic Review of Privacy and Security Risks, and Best Practices for Data Protection

Fresh takes on five health data sharing domains: Quality, privacy, equity, incentives, and sustainability

The Ethical and Societal Considerations for the Rise of Artificial Intelligence and Big Data in Ophthalmology

Understanding, Requirements, Challenges, and Existing Techniques for Data Security and Privacy

Big data in visual field testing for glaucoma

A Review of Privacy and Consent Management in Healthcare: A Focus on Emerging Data Sources

The Privacy and Security Implications of Open Data in Healthcare

Digital technology, tele-medicine and artificial intelligence in ophthalmology: A global perspective

Privacy-preserving Data Mining, Sharing and Publishing

Ethical dimensions of clinical data sharing by US healthcare organizations for purposes beyond direct patient care: Interviews with healthcare leaders

Revolutionizing Medical Data Sharing Using Advanced Privacy Enhancing Technologies: Technical, Legal and Ethical Synthesis