Evolution of mitochondrial RNA editing in extant gymnosperms

Chung‐Shien Wu,Shu‐Miaw Chaw
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.15916
IF: 7.2
2022-07-26
The Plant Journal
Abstract:SUMMARY To unveil the evolution of mitochondrial RNA editing in gymnosperms, we characterized mitogenomes, plastomes, RNA editing sites, and pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) proteins from ten key taxa representing four of the five extant gymnosperm clades. The assembled mitogenomes vary in gene content due to massive gene losses in Gnetum and Conifer II clades. Mitochondrial gene expression levels also vary according to protein function, with the highest expressed genes involved in the respiratory complex. We identified 9,132 mitochondrial C‐to‐U editing sites, as well as 2,846 P‐class and 8,530 PLS‐class PPR proteins. Regains of editing sites were demonstrated in Conifer II rps3 transcripts whose corresponding mitogenomic sequences lack introns due to retroprocessing. Our analyses reveal that nonsynonymous editing is efficient and results in more codons encoding hydrophobic amino acids. In contrast, synonymous editing, although performed with variable efficiency, can increase the number of U‐ending codons that are preferentially utilized in gymnosperm mitochondria. The inferred loss‐to‐gain ratio of mitochondrial editing sites in gymnosperms is 2.1:1, of which losses of nonsynonymous editing are mainly due to genomic C‐to‐T substitutions. However, such substitutions only explain a small fraction of synonymous editing site losses, indicating distinct evolutionary mechanisms. We show that gymnosperms have experienced multiple lineage‐specific duplications in PLS‐class RRP proteins. These duplications likely contribute to accumulated RNA editing sites, as a mechanistic correlation between RNA editing and PLS‐class PPR proteins is statistically supported.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?