Abstract:In the information age, a person’s ability to read and make data visualizations is nearly as important as being able to read and write text. This article reports the results of a multi-phase study conducted in informal learning environments in three US science museums. The goal of the study was to determine the familiarity of youth and adult museum visitors with different visualization types. To address this, a total of 273 visitors were shown 5 out of 20 different visualizations that included two charts, five maps, eight graphs, and five network layouts. They were asked to judge the familiarity of the visualization, provide information on how to read it, and provide a name and identify typical locations where they would encounter the data display and possible data sources that might be visualized in this way. The results show that while most participants have a strong interest in science, math, and art, many have a hard time naming and interpreting visualizations. Participants in this study commonly encounter visualizations in school, in books, at work, on the Internet, and in the news. Overall, they were more familiar with basic charts, maps, and graphs, but very few are familiar with network layouts and most have no ability in reading network visualizations. When asked how they would interpret the visualizations, most participants pointed to superficial features such as color, lines, or text as important to developing understanding. Overall, we found that participants were interested in the visualizations we presented to them, but had significant limitations in identifying and understanding them. The results substantiate intuitions shared by many regarding the rather low level of data visualization literacy of general audiences. We hope they will help catalyze novel research on the development of easy-to-use yet effective visualizations with standardized names and guaranteed properties that can be readily used by those interested to understand and solve real-world problems. The results also have implications for how information visualizations are taught and used in formal and informal education, the media, or in different professions.

Replacing bar graphs of continuous data with more informative graphics: Are we making progress?

Quantifying Data Distortion in Bar Graphs in Biological Research

Testing Statistical Charts: What Makes a Good Graph?

Graphical Perception in Animated Bar Charts

Can visualization alleviate dichotomous thinking? Effects of visual representations on the cliff effect

Comparing Overlapping Data Distributions Using Visualization

Visualization of Age Distributions as Elements of Medical Data-Stories

Two graphs walk into a bar: Readout-based measurement reveals the Bar-Tip Limit error, a common, categorical misinterpretation of mean bar graphs

Improving Visualization Interpretation Using Counterfactuals.

Understanding Transitions in Animated Bar Charts

Which One Changes More? A Novel Radial Visualization for State Change Comparison

Graphs in Scientific Visualization: A Survey.

Dynamite plots in surgical research over 10 years: a meta-study using machine-learning analysis

Influence of data visualisations on laboratorians' acceptance of method comparison studies

Investigating aspects of data visualization literacy using 20 information visualizations and 273 science museum visitors

Investigating the Use of a Dynamic Physical Bar Chart for Data Exploration and Presentation

The Risks of Ranking: Revisiting Graphical Perception to Model Individual Differences in Visualization Performance

Task-Based Effectiveness of Basic Visualizations

Metrics-Based Evaluation and Comparison of Visualization Notations

Graph Visualization: Alternative Models Inspired by Bioinformatics

Comparative Evaluation of Animated Scatter Plot Transitions