Abstract:Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) is the most effective procedure to resolve male infertility, enhancing overall fertilization and pregnancy outcomes. However, it is important to note that fertilization failure (FF) can still occur in a few cases after ICSI. This study aims to introduce a specialized technique of aggressive sperm immobilization for ICSI and evaluate its impact on reproductive outcomes in cases involving prior fertilization failure. All infertile couples with male partners having suboptimal semen samples and previous ICSI fertilization failure were evaluated using retrospective data from National Taiwan tertiary university hospital (NTUH) between January 2016 and February 2022. Fertilization failure in our study was defined as less than 30% fertilization rate (FR, the number of normally fertilized oocytes divided by the total number of injected mature oocytes). Data involving both standard (routine procedure) and aggressive sperm immobilization (SI) techniques during different ICSI cycles were included in this study. Standard and aggressive SI methods were performed by compressing the distal half tail of the spermatozoa ≦ 5 and 15 times prior to ICSI respectively. Generalized estimating equations analysis were applied to compare the clinical outcomes between two procedures. Overall, data from 23 infertile couples who had undergone 65 ICSI cycles (31 standard SI with low fertilization rate and 34 aggressive SI) were included in the study. The average FR in the ICSI cycles with standard SI and aggressive SI were 23.6 ± 23.1% and 49.5 ± 31.8 respectively ( P = 0.0002). The majority of embryos were transferred at the day 3 stage, with an average number transferred of 2.6 ± 0.9 in the aggressive SI group and 1.9 ± 0.9 in the standard group. The number of embryos transferred per transfer cycle was higher in the aggressive SI ( P = 0.015), whereas the number of good-quality embryos was similar between the two procedures ( P = 0.44). There were one and seven live births from the standard SI cycles and aggressive SI cycles respectively. In conclusion, aggressive SI was associated with a significantly higher FR, resulting in more available embryos for transfer without compromising embryo quality. Therefore, this specialized technique improved pregnancy outcome among infertile couples with a previous ICSI–FF. It can be a safe, economic, and effective method to improve the assisted reproductive technologies outcomes for infertile patients affected by previous ICSI–FF.

Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Improves Normal Fertilization Rate and Clinical Pregnancy Rate in Male Infertility

ICSI Does Not Improve Live Birth Rates but Yields Higher Cancellation Rates Than Conventional IVF in Unexplained Infertility

Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Versus Conventional In-Vitro Fertilisation for Couples with Infertility with Non-Severe Male Factor: a Multicentre, Open-Label, Randomised Controlled Trial

[Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection in the Management of Male Infertility and Idiopathic Fertilization Failure].

Comparison Between the Results of ICSI with Fresh and with Frozen-thawed Sperm Obtained by PESA to Treat Azoospermia

[The Evaluation of 156 Cycles of Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection in the Management of Male Infertility and Idiopathic Infertility].

The impact of intracytoplasmic sperm injection versus conventional in vitro fertilization on the reproductive outcomes of couples with non-male factor infertility and frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles

The effect of ICSI in infertility couples with non-male factor: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Research on the clinical application of intracytoplasmic sperm injection

Clinical Analysis of Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection in Patients with Previous Fertilization Failure after Conventional IVF

Efficacy of Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection in Women with Non-Male Factor Infertility: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

[Intracytoplasmic Injection with Sperm from Ejaculation, Epididymis and Testis in Treating Different Male Infertility with Oligo-Asthenozoospermia or Azoospermia ].

#244 : Reproductive Outcomes of Conventional in Vitro Fertilization and Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection in Patients with Non-Severe Male Infertility Across Poor and Different Suboptimal Ovarian Response Categories

Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection May Not Improve Clinical Outcomes Despite Its Positive Effect on Embryo Results: A Retrospective Analysis of 1130 Half-ICSI Treatments

Aggressive sperm immobilization improves reproductive outcomes in patients with suboptimal semen parameters and previous ICSI fertilization failure

ICSI Treatment of Severe Male Infertility Can Achieve Prospective Embryo Quality Compared with IVF of Fertile Donor Sperm on Sibling Oocytes

Fertilization of in Vitro Matured Human Oocytes by Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection （ICSI） Using Ejaculated and Testicular Spermatozoa

Safety evaluation of single-sperm cryopreservation technique applied in intracytoplasmic sperm injection

Reproductive Outcomes of Conventional In Vitro Fertilization and Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection in Patients with Non-Severe Male Infertility Across Poor and Different Sub-Optimal Ovarian Response Categories: A Cohort Study Based on 30,352 Fresh Cycles from 2009–2019

Higher Abnormal Fertilization, Higher Cleavage Rate, and Higher Arrested Embryos Rate Were Found in Conventional Ivf Than in Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection

Comparison of the Outcome of Conventional in Vitro Fertilization and Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection in Moderate Male Infertility from Ejaculate.