Abstract:Abstract. Robust appraisals of climate impacts at different levels of global-mean temperature increase are vital to guide assessments of dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system. The 2015 Paris Agreement includes a two-headed temperature goal: "holding the increase in the global average temperature to well below 2 °C above pre-industrial levels and pursuing efforts to limit the temperature increase to 1.5 °C". Despite the prominence of these two temperature limits, a comprehensive overview of the differences in climate impacts at these levels is still missing. Here we provide an assessment of key impacts of climate change at warming levels of 1.5 °C and 2 °C, including extreme weather events, water availability, agricultural yields, sea-level rise and risk of coral reef loss. Our results reveal substantial differences in impacts between a 1.5 °C and 2 °C warming that are highly relevant for the assessment of dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system. For heat-related extremes, the additional 0.5 °C increase in global-mean temperature marks the difference between events at the upper limit of present-day natural variability and a new climate regime, particularly in tropical regions. Similarly, this warming difference is likely to be decisive for the future of tropical coral reefs. In a scenario with an end-of-century warming of 2 °C, virtually all tropical coral reefs are projected to be at risk of severe degradation due to temperature-induced bleaching from 2050 onwards. This fraction is reduced to about 90 % in 2050 and projected to decline to 70 % by 2100 for a 1.5 °C scenario. Analyses of precipitation-related impacts reveal distinct regional differences and hot-spots of change emerge. Regional reduction in median water availability for the Mediterranean is found to nearly double from 9 % to 17 % between 1.5 °C and 2 °C, and the projected lengthening of regional dry spells increases from 7 to 11 %. Projections for agricultural yields differ between crop types as well as world regions. While some (in particular high-latitude) regions may benefit, tropical regions like West Africa, South-East Asia, as well as Central and northern South America are projected to face substantial local yield reductions, particularly for wheat and maize. Best estimate sea-level rise projections based on two illustrative scenarios indicate a 50 cm rise by 2100 relative to year 2000-levels for a 2 °C scenario, and about 10 cm lower levels for a 1.5 °C scenario. In a 1.5 °C scenario, the rate of sea-level rise in 2100 would be reduced by about 30 % compared to a 2 °C scenario. Our findings highlight the importance of regional differentiation to assess both future climate risks and different vulnerabilities to incremental increases in global-mean temperature. The article provides a consistent and comprehensive assessment of existing projections and a good basis for future work on refining our understanding of the difference between impacts at 1.5 °C and 2 °C warming.

The Inequality of Climate Change From 1.5 to 2°C of Global Warming

Limiting global warming to 1.5 °C will lower increases in inequalities of four hazard indicators of climate change

Differential climate impacts for policy-relevant limits to global warming: the case of 1.5 °C and 2 °C

Bajemos La Temperatura : Por Que Se Debe Evitar Un Planeta 4 Degree C Mas Calido - Resumen Ejecutivo

Global Warming of 1.5°C

The human imperative of stabilizing global climate change at 1.5°C

Diminuir Calor : Por Que Um Mundo 4 Degree C Mais Quente Precisa Ser Evitado - Resumo Executivo

Quantifying risks avoided by limiting global warming to 1.5 or 2 °C above pre-industrial levels

The Paris Agreement and climate justice: Inequitable impacts of sea level rise associated with temperature targets

Scenarios towards limiting global mean temperature increase below 1.5 °C

‘1.5°C to stay alive’: climate change, imperialism and justice for the Caribbean

The Paris Target, Human Rights, and IPCC Weaknesses: Legal Arguments in Favour of Smaller Carbon Budgets

Climate change impacts increase economic inequality: evidence from a systematic literature review

Climate extremes, land-climate feedbacks and land-use forcing at 1.5°C

Does global warming worsen poverty and inequality? An updated review

Climate Change and Inequality: How to Solve These Problems Jointly?

A multi-model assessment of inequality and climate change

Adaptive emission reduction approach to reach any global warming target

Socioeconomic factors and future challenges of the goal of limiting the increase in global average temperature to 1.5 °C

A justice-based framework to determine countries’ fair warming contributions to Paris Agreement

On the Chances of Staying below the 1.5°C Warming Target