Peter W Horby,Jonathan R Emberson,Louise Thwaites,Mark Campbell,Leon Peto,Guilherme Pessoa-Amorim,Natalie Staplin,Raph L Hamers,John Amuasi,Jeremy Nel,Evelyne Kestelyn,Nguyen Thanh Phong,Anil Shrestha,Nasronudin Nasronudin,Rahuldeb Sarkar,Pham Ngoc Thach,Damodar Patel,Uun Samardi,Richard Stewart,Erni Nelwan,Manisha Rawal,J Kenneth Baillie,Maya H Buch,Jeremy N Day,Saul N Faust,Thomas Jaki,Katie Jeffery,Edmund Juszczak,Marian Knight,Wei Shen Lim,Marion Mafham,Alan Montgomery,Andrew Mumford,Kathryn Rowan,Buddha Basnyat,Richard Haynes,Martin J Landray

Abstract:Background: Low dose corticosteroids have been shown to reduce mortality for hypoxic COVID-19 patients. We have previously reported that higher dose corticosteroids cause harm in patients with hypoxia but not receiving ventilatory support (non-invasive mechanical ventilation, invasive mechanical ventilation or extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation), but the balance of efficacy and safety in patients receiving ventilatory support is uncertain. Methods: This randomised, controlled, open-label platform trial (Randomised Evaluation of COVID-19 Therapy [RECOVERY]) assessed multiple possible treatments in patients hospitalised for COVID-19. Eligible and consenting adult patients receiving ventilatory support were randomly allocated (1:1) to either usual care with higher dose corticosteroids (dexamethasone 20 mg once daily for 5 days followed by 10 mg once daily for 5 days or until discharge if sooner) or usual standard of care alone (which includes dexamethasone 6 mg once daily for 10 days or until discharge if sooner). The primary outcome was 28-day mortality; secondary outcomes were duration of hospitalisation and (among participants not on invasive mechanical ventilation at baseline) the composite of invasive mechanical ventilation or death. Recruitment closed on 31 March 2024 when funding for the trial ended. The RECOVERY trial is registered with ISRCTN (50189673) and clinicaltrials.gov ( ). Findings: Between 25 May 2021 and 9 January 2024, 477 COVID-19 patients receiving ventilatory support were randomly allocated to receive usual care plus higher dose corticosteroids versus usual care alone (of whom 99% received corticosteroids during the follow-up period). Of those randomised, 221 (46%) were in Asia, 245 (51%) in the UK and 11 (2%) in Africa. 143 (30%) had diabetes mellitus. Overall, 86 (35%) of 246 patients allocated to higher dose corticosteroids versus 86 (37%) of 231 patients allocated to usual care died within 28 days (rate ratio [RR] 0.87; 95% CI 0.64-1.18; p=0.37). There was no significant difference in the proportion of patients discharged from hospital alive within 28 days (128 [52%] in the higher dose corticosteroids group vs 120 [52%] in the usual care group; RR 1.04, 0.81-1.33]; p=0.78). Among those not on invasive mechanical ventilation at baseline, there was no significant difference in the proportion meeting the composite endpoint of invasive mechanical ventilation or death (76 [37%] of 206 vs 93 [45%] of 205; RR 0.79 [95% CI 0.63-1.00]; p=0.05). Interpretation: In patients hospitalised for COVID-19 receiving ventilatory support, we found no evidence that higher dose corticosteroids reduced the risk of death compared to usual care, which included low dose corticosteroids.

Impact of dexamethasone on the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia in mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients: a propensity-matched cohort study

Impact Clinically Related Factors on the Outcomes of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia

Corticosteroid in Non-Covid-19 Induced Community-Acquired Pneumonia, a Meta-Analysis.

Prevalence and etiology of ventilator‐associated pneumonia during the COVID‐19 pandemic in Denmark: Wave‐dependent lessons learned from a mixed‐ICU

Comparative effectiveness of dexamethasone in treatment of hospitalized COVID-19 patients in the United States during the first year of the pandemic: Findings from the National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C) data repository

Impact of Early Corticosteroids on Preventing Clinical Deterioration in Non-critically Ill Patients Hospitalized with COVID-19: A Multi-hospital Cohort Study

Effect of methylprednisolone treatment on COVID-19: An inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis

Dexamethasone in Hospitalized Patients with Covid-19

Incidence and Prognosis of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia in Critically Ill Patients with COVID-19: A Multicenter Study

Associations between corticosteroid dosage and clinical outcomes in patients with hypoxemic COVID-19 pneumonia: A retrospective cohort study

Effect of early administration of dexamethasone in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia without acute hypoxemic respiratory failure and risk of development of acute respiratory distress syndrome: EARLY-DEX COVID-19 trial

The effect of dexamethasone on the incidence of delirium in patients hospitalized due COVID-19 infection: a retrospective cohort study

Impact of Dexamethasone on COVID-19 Patients

Impact of corticosteroids on the duration of ventilatory support during severe acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in patients in the intensive care unit: a study protocol for a multicentre, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial

Effectiveness of Dexamethasone for COVID-19 in Hospitalized Patients with Diabetes: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Higher dose corticosteroids in hospitalised COVID-19 patients requiring ventilatory support (RECOVERY): a randomised, controlled, open-label, platform trial

Effect of high versus low dose of dexamethasone on clinical worsening in patients hospitalised with moderate or severe COVID-19 Pneumonia: an open-label, randomised clinical trial

Effect of methylprednisolone in reducing severe COVID-19 and mortality in high-risk patients: A retrospective study

Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia in Patients with COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Prolonged higher dose methylprednisolone versus conventional dexamethasone in COVID-19 pneumonia: a randomised controlled trial (MEDEAS)

Dosage and utilization of dexamethasone in the management of COVID-19: A critical review