Effects of rTMS treatment on global cognitive function in Alzheimer's disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Tianjiao Zhang,Youxin Sui,Qian Lu,Xingjun Xu,Yi Zhu,Wenjun Dai,Ying Shen,Tong Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2022.984708
IF: 4.8
2022-09-09
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
Abstract:Background: Although repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has been extensively studied in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD), the clinical evidence remains inconsistent. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the effects of rTMS on global cognitive function in patients with AD. Methods: An integrated literature search using 4 databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library) was performed to identify English language articles published up to October 6, 2021. We pooled Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale (ADAS-Cog) scores using a random-effects model via RevMan 5.4 software. We calculated estimates of mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). The primary outcomes were pre-post treatment changes in global cognition as measured using MMSE and ADAS-Cog immediately after rTMS treatment, and the secondary outcome was duration of cognitive improvement (1–1.5 and ≥3 months). Results: Nine studies with 361 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The results showed that rTMS significantly improved global cognitive function immediately following rTMS treatment [(MD) 1.82, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.41–2.22, p 0.05) or adverse effect rate ( p > 0.05) between the rTMS and control groups. Conclusions: Repetitive TMS is a potentially effective treatment for cognitive impairment in AD that is safe and can induce long-lasting effects. Our results also showed that ADAS-cog and MMSE differed in determination of global cognitive impairment. Systematic review registration: http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO, PROSPERO CRD42022315545.
neurosciences,geriatrics & gerontology,gerontology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?