Role of Antihypertensive Treatment and Blood Pressure Control in the Occurrence of Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes: a Population-Based Study of Linked Electronic Health Records

Sukainah Al Khalaf,Ali S. Khashan,Lucy C. Chappell,Éilis J. O’Reilly,Fergus P. McCarthy,Sukainah Al KhalafAli S. KhashanLucy C. ChappellÉilis J. O'ReillyFergus P. McCarthySchool of Public Health,University College Cork,Ireland. (S.A.K.,A.S.K.,E.J.O.)INFANT Research Centre,University College Cork,Ireland. (S.A.K.,A.S.K.,F.P.M.)Department of Women and Children's Health,King's College London (L.C.C.).Department of Nutrition,Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health,Boston,MA (E.J.O.). Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology,Cork University Hospital,Ireland.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.122.18920
IF: 9.8968
2022-05-05
Hypertension
Abstract:Chronic hypertension (CH) adversely impacts pregnancy. It remains unclear whether antihypertensive treatment alters these risks. We examined the role of antihypertensive treatment in the association between CH and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Electronic health records from the UK Caliber and Clinical Practice Research Datalink were used to define a cohort of women delivering between 1997 and 2016. Primary outcomes were preeclampsia, preterm birth (PTB), and fetal growth restriction (FGR). We used multivariable logistic regression to compare outcomes in women with CH to women without CH and propensity score matching to compare antihypertensive agents. The study cohort consisted of 1 304 679 women and 1 894 184 births. 14 595 (0.77%) had CH, and 6786 (0.36%) were prescribed antihypertensive medications in pregnancy. Overall, women with CH (versus no CH), had higher odds of preeclampsia (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 5.74 [95% CI, 5.44–6.07]); PTB (aOR, 2.53 [2.39–2.67]); and FGR (aOR, 2.51 [2.31–2.72]). Women with CH prescribed treatment (versus untreated women) had higher odds of preeclampsia (aOR, 1.17 [1.05–1.30]), PTB (1.25 [1.12–1.39]), and FGR (1.80 [1.51–2.14]). Women prescribed methyldopa (versus β-blockers) had higher odds of preeclampsia (aOR, 1.43 [1.19–1.73]); PTB (1.59 [1.30–1.93]), but lower odds of FGR (aOR, 0.66 [0.48–0.90]). Odds of adverse outcomes were similar in relation to calcium channel blockers (versus β-blockers) except for PTB (aOR, 1.94 [1.15–3.27]). Among women prescribed treatment, lower average blood pressure (<135/85 mm Hg) was associated with better pregnancy outcomes. Treatment with antihypertensive agents and control of hypertension ameliorates some effects but higher risks of adverse outcomes persist. β-Blockers versus methyldopa may be associated with better pregnancy outcomes except for FGR. Powered trials are needed to inform optimal treatment of CH during pregnancy.
peripheral vascular disease
What problem does this paper attempt to address?