Abstract:Review articles aim to give an overview of the current scientific knowledge on a specific topic and are an important element of evidence-based medicine. Technically, review articles do not generate new data, but rather identify, structure, evaluate and summarize the evidence of existing primary research studies.<a class="ref showRefEvent2" href="#">1</a> While narrative review articles usually apply a less stringent methodology and present a broader scope of a topic, systematic reviews aim to answer precisely a specific scientific question by synthesizing the available evidence qualitatively and, whenever possible, quantitatively as meta-analyses, which requires profound methodological knowledge and skills in statistics. Narrative and systematic elements (with or without meta-analysis) can also be combined in one article.<a class="ref showRefEvent2" href="#">2</a> In any case, review articles tend to be of high quality, basically for two reasons: first, since they reach out to a broader audience and their visibility is more long-lasting compared with fast-moving original studies, authors and publishers want to ensure they do not lose their reputation. And second, they are usually written by either experts of a certain field or by researchers who are specifically dedicated to, and have a high level of expertise in, conducting systematic reviews and meta-analyses. At the same time, writing a review article comes with a considerable burden of responsibility because they shape future research.<a class="ref showRefEvent2" href="#">1</a> For instance, where evidence is scarce, review articles can create awareness of an unmet need to start up new projects. In other fields, evidence can be so abundant that it has become nearly impossible for researchers to read and appraise all available studies, and review articles are a welcomed source to understand current evidence with a reasonable effort of time.

How to write a good scientific review article

How to write a review article?

Young GI angle: Why and how to write a good review article

How to be a good reviewer: A step-by-step guide for approaching peer review of a scientific manuscript

The Science of Literature Reviews: Searching, Identifying, Selecting, and Synthesising

Advancing knowledge through literature reviews: ‘what’, ‘why’, and ‘how to contribute’

Scientific research article – How to write and get it published?

How I am working as a reviewer?

How to Guide Students Write Medical Reviews

Literature Review in Scientific Research: An Overview

Systematic Review Reporting - Writing concisely and precisely

How to write an article: An introduction to basic scientific medical writing

The art of writing literature review: What do we know and what do we need to know?

How to write a contemporary scientific article

Studying review articles in scientometrics and beyond: a research agenda

Writing a strong scientific paper in medicine and the biomedical sciences: a checklist and recommendations for early career researchers

Publishing in high quality journals: perspectives from overworked and unpaid reviewers

Tips and Tricks for a Successful Literature Review as Part of Medical Career Development

Reviewing the animal literature: how to describe and choose between different types of literature reviews

What constitutes an excellent literature review? Summarize, synthesize, conceptualize, and energize

How to write an effective journal peer review using a staged writing approach: a best-practice guide for early-career researchers