Incidence-severity relationships in non-treated and fungicide-treated wheat head blast epidemics in Brazil

Gustavo Bilibio dos Santos,Maurício Antonio de Oliveira Coelho,Emerson Medeiros Del Ponte
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-022-02519-5
2022-07-06
European Journal of Plant Pathology
Abstract:The relationship between wheat head blast incidence ( I; proportion of diseased heads in a sample) and severity ( S ; the average diseased area in a sample of heads) was studied with the aim of determining whether severity could be reliably predicted from incidence. Data were collected from two main sources: a) the EPAMIG (non-treated) field experiments spanning seven years (2013–2019 with three cultivars) designed to evaluate the effect of planting dates on wheat blast (no fungicide use); and b) the UFTs (fungicide-treated) field experiments conducted by researchers of the network of uniform fungicide trials conducted during nine years (2012–2020) across 10 locations (totaling 14 cultivars). An ordinary linear regression model fitted to the complementary log-log transformation of the data provided a good fit to the data based on the square correlation of the predicted Ŝ, and the observed S ( R 2 ): The R 2 was 0.95 for the pooled (all years) non-treated dataset and 0.88 for the pooled fungicide-treated dataset. A covariance analysis indicated that year, but not cultivar, significantly affected the parameters of the I-S relationship in the non-treated dataset. We conclude that wheat head blast S can be predicted from I but more reliably in non-treated epidemics given the larger influence of chemical treatments on the relationship than cultivar or year, a surrogate for varying weather.
plant sciences,horticulture,agronomy
What problem does this paper attempt to address?