Abstract:Purpose: Robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (RAPN) has become a key technology in the treatment of renal tumors. Effective preoperative planning and precise intraoperative navigation are critical to a successful surgical outcome. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical application value of mixed reality (MR) in robotic nephron-sparing partial nephrectomy for patients with renal tumors of different complexity based on the R.E.N.A.L. score. Patients and methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 68 eligible patients with renal cancer who underwent RAPN at The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University from January 2021 to December 2023, with postoperative pathology confirmation. Patients were divided into two groups: the MR group, with 28 cases, and the traditional imaging (control) group, with 40 cases. All patients underwent mid-abdominal CT plain scans and enhancements. The MR group utilized three-dimensional reconstruction of CT data and employed 3D tablets and HoloLens glasses for preoperative discussions, surgical planning, and intraoperative guidance. Collect clinical data and metrics to assess surgical outcomes, as well as evaluate performance in areas such as preoperative discussions, doctor-patient communication, surgical planning, and intraoperative navigation. Results: Compared to robot-assisted partial nephrectomy in the control group, the MR group experienced a reduction in operation time by approximately 30 min [(135.89 ± 23.494) min vs. (165.00 ± 34.320) min, P< 0.001)] and a decrease in ischemia time by around 2.5 min [(20.36 ± 3.956) min vs. (23.80± 6.889) min, P = 0.02)]. Within the subgroup with a R.E.N.A.L. score of less than 7 points, the MR group only showed a significant reduction in operation time [(134.55 ± 150.190) min vs. (150.19 ± 28.638) min, P = 0.045], with no notable differences in other parameters. For the subgroup with a R.E.N.A.L. score of 7 points or higher, the MR group exhibited shorter operation time [(140.83 ± 25.183) min vs. (195.77 ± 23.080) min, P< 0.001] and reduced warm ischemia time [(21.17 ± 2.714) min vs. (28.85 ± 7.570) min, P = 0.029]. Additionally, there was less estimated blood loss [(53.33 ± 5.164) min vs. (114.62 ± 80.376) min, P = 0.018]. All patients had negative resection margins, indicating equivalent therapeutic outcomes between the two groups. Conclusion: In comparison to traditional RAPN, MR technology demonstrates the ability to decrease operation time and warm ischemia time all the while maintaining equivalent curative outcomes. Additionally, it enhances preoperative discussions, doctor-patient interactions, preoperative strategizing, and intraoperative navigation, particularly excelling in complex renal tumor cases of RAPN, where its benefits are most pronounced.

Nurse-led coordinated surgical care pathways for cost optimization of robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy: medico-economic analysis of the UroCCR-25 AMBU-REIN study

A combination of enhanced recovery after surgery and prehabilitation pathways improves perioperative outcomes and costs for robotic radical prostatectomy

Last Resort from Nursing Shortage? Comparative Cost Analysis of Open vs. Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomies with a Focus on the Costs of Nursing Care

Combined robotic approach and enhanced recovery after surgery pathway for optimization of costs in patients undergoing proctectomy

Perioperative and Long-Term Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy: A Systematic Review

Time-Driven Activity-based Costing and Outcomes of Same-Day Discharge vs Inpatient Robotic Partial and Radical Nephrectomy

SAFE: Multi-institutional study of time to complications after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy, selection of a population eligible for outpatient management (UroCCR 90)

Robotic Partial Nephrectomy: Current Technique and Outcomes

Open versus robotic partial nephrectomy in obese patients: a multi-institutional propensity score-matched analysis (UroCCR 43—Robese study)

Impact of outcomes and costs for implementation of robotic radical cystectomy with full intracorporeal urinary diversion

Clinical impact of an enhanced recovery protocol implementation for nephrectomy and radical prostatectomy

Single-port vs multi-port robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: A single center propensity score-matched analysis

Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing and Outcomes of Same Day-Discharge versus Inpatient Robotic Partial and Radical Nephrectomy

Comparison of peri- and intraoperative outcomes of open vs robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: a propensity-matched analysis

Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy: Step-by-step Contemporary Technique and Surgical Outcomes at a Single High-volume Institution

A Multidimensional Analysis of Prostate Surgery Costs in the United States: Robotic-Assisted versus Retropubic Radical Prostatectomy

Annual nationwide analysis of costs and post-operative outcomes after radical prostatectomy according to the surgical approach (open, laparoscopic, and robotic)

The clinical application value of mixed reality in robotic laparoscopic partial nephrectomy

Comparison of Perioperative, Functional, and Oncologic Outcomes of Open vs. Robot-Assisted Off-Clamp Partial Nephrectomy: A Propensity Scored Match Analysis

Robotic-assisted radical cystectomy with cutaneous ureterostomies: a contemporary multicenter analysis

Single Port Robotic Nephrectomy via lower anterior retroperitoneal approach: feasible, safe and effective option in surgically complex patients