Abstract:Xiaofei Wang, 1, 2, &ast Jihang Dai, 2, &ast Zhimin Wu, 1, 2 Yuxia Yang, 2 Jian Zhang, 2 Xiangji Meng, 1, 2 Wenkang Liu, 2 Wenyong Fei, 2 Jingcheng Wang 2 1 The Graduate School, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning, People's Republic of China; 2 Department of Orthopedics, Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital Affiliated to Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China &astThese authors contributed equally to this work Correspondence: Wenyong Fei; Jingcheng Wang, Email ; Objective: To compare the clinical efficacy of artificial total hip arthroplasty(THA) for femoral neck fracture between direct anterior approach(DAA) in lateral position and posterior lateral approach(PLA). Methods: Comparison of 200 cases of patients who underwent THA collected between September 2019 and August 2021 was done. Incision length, intraoperative bleeding, operative time, difference in postoperative haemoglobin from preoperative levels, length of hospital stay, postoperative time to get off the floor, visual analogue score (VAS) for pain, preoperative and postoperative Harris scores for the hip, and measurements of the acetabular abduction angle and anterior acetabular tilt angle at 6 months postoperatively were collected, and all the cases were followed up for at least 2 years. Results: Compared with the PLA group, the DAA group had a shorter incision length, less intraoperative blood loss, less postoperative haemoglobin reduction compared with the preoperative period, a shorter hospital stay and an earlier first time to get off the floor after surgery, however, the comparison of operative times was not statistically significant; Patients in the DAA group had a lower VAS in the early postoperative period compared to PLA; Patients in the DAA group had higher hip Harris scores at 6 weeks and 6 months postoperatively; There was no significant difference in acetabular abduction angle and acetabular anterior tilt angle between the two groups at 6 months postoperatively. Conclusion: Compared to PLA, DAA in THA is minimally invasive, has less pain, less bleeding, earlier time out of bed, shorter hospital stay, better early hip function, faster rehabilitation, and better joint stability. Keywords: direct lateral approach, DAA, femoral neck fractures, total hip arthroplasty, THA, Hip function, postoperative rehabilitation With the aging of the population, the number of patients with hip fractures is gradually increasing, and femoral neck fracture is one of the common fractures of the hip. 1,2 Patients will experience a significant reduction in quality of life after fracture, with high rates of disability and mortality. 3,4 Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a common surgical procedure for the treatment of femoral neck fracture in the elderly, and its surgical approaches mainly include posterolateral approach (PLA) and direct anterior approach (DAA). 5,6 PLA is a traditional method that allows adequate exposure of the surgical field, but PLA also has the disadvantages of high intraoperative bleeding and elevated risk of dislocation. 7,8 DAA is a surgical approach that follows the anatomical structure of the human internervous/muscular planes, which is less traumatic and can effectively avoid damage to important blood vessels and nerves. 9,10 At present, there is a lack of follow-up comparisons between DAA and PLA. In this study, the aim of this study is to compare the clinical effect of DAA and PLA on femoral neck fracture. Inclusion criteria: (1) Patients with initial unilateral THA; (2) BMI <30 kg / m2; (3) Able to walk independently before fracture. Exclusion criteria: (1) Hip dysplasia or congenital hip disease; (2) those with preoperative infectious diseases; (3) those who could not tolerate the risks of surgery and anaesthesia and those who could not complete the postoperative rehabilitation successfully; and (4) those with other contraindications to surgery. From September 2019 to August 2021, 200 patients with THA were selected, including 103 cases of DAA and 97 cases of PLA. Male 84 cases, female 116 cases. The general data of the two groups of patients, sex, age, BMI (body mass index) and other statistical comparison, found that the differences between the groups had no statistical significance (P > 0.05, Table 1). All patients undergo surgery within a week of the fracture. Table 1 Demographics and Preoperative Data After the success of general anaesthesia, the patient is placed in the uninjured lateral position, fixed the position, and m -Abstract Truncated-

Effect of anterior approach compared to posterolateral approach on readiness for discharge and thrombogenic markers in patients undergoing unilateral total hip arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study

Improved patient reported outcomes with the direct anterior approach versus the posterior approach for total hip arthroplasty in the early post-operative period

Efficacy of direct anterior approach versus posterolateral approach in total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis

In primary total hip arthroplasty, the direct anterior approach leads to higher levels of creatine kinase and lower levels of C-reactive protein compared to the posterolateral approach: a propensity score matching analysis of short-term follow-up data

Comparison of direct anterior approach and posterolateral approach in total hip arthroplasty: short-term clinical efficacy

Comparison of Early Rehabilitation Effects of Total Hip Arthroplasty with Direct Anterior Approach Versus Posterior Approach

A systematic review and meta-analysis of direct anterior approach versus posterior approach in total hip arthroplasty

Direct anterior approach versus posterolateral approach for total hip arthroplasty in the treatment of femoral neck fractures in elderly patients: a meta-analysis and systematic review

Total Hip Arthroplasty: Direct Anterior Approach Versus Posterior Approach in the First Year of Practice

John Charnley Award: Randomized Clinical Trial of Direct Anterior and Miniposterior Approach THA: Which Provides Better Functional Recovery?

Does Approach Matter in Robotic-Assisted Total Hip Arthroplasty? A Comparison of Early Re-operations Between Direct Anterior and Postero-lateral Approach

Transition from straight lateral to direct anterior approach in total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective single-centre study

Comparison of DAA and PLA Approaches for Total Hip Replacement in the Treatment of Femoral Neck Fractures

Functional outcome of direct anterior versus posterior approach in total hip arthroplasty: a propensity-matched Asian study

Conversion of a Fused or Ankylosed Hip to Total Hip Arthroplasty: is the Direct Anterior Approach in the Lateral Decubitus Position an Ideal Solution?

Direct Anterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fractures in the Lateral Position

Direct anterior versus mini-anterolateral approach for primary total hip arthroplasty: early postoperative outcomes and complications

Learning curve and initial outcomes of a novel percutaneously endoscopic-assisted total hip arthroplasty through mini bikini direct anterior approach: an observational cohort study

Comparing direct anterior approach versus posterior approach or lateral approach in total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Impact of surgical approaches on stem position and hidden blood loss in total hip arthroplasty: minimally invasive vs. posterolateral

Progress of direct anterior approach in hip hemiarthroplasty in elderly patients