Transforming Tradition: the Reform of Chinese Theater in the 1950s and Early 1960s by Siyuan Liu
Chengzhou He
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/cdr.2022.0018
2022-01-01
Comparative Drama
Abstract:Reviewed by: Transforming Tradition: The Reform of Chinese Theater in the 1950s and Early 1960s by Siyuan Liu Chengzhou He (bio) Siyuan Liu. Transforming Tradition: The Reform of Chinese Theater in the 1950s and Early 1960s. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2021. Pp. xiv + 458 + 43 illus. $85.00 hardcover, $69.95 ebook. Since the early 20th century, the modernization of xiqu has been continuously transforming the tradition of Chinese theatre, which nevertheless has exerted transformative power on the real world socially, politically, and culturally. The reform of traditional theatre in the 1950s and early 1960s was so radical and comprehensive that xiqu has undergone extensive changes in terms of repertoire, performance conventions, play creation, management, and touring. It is perhaps not much an exaggeration to say that “xiqu today is, to a significant extent, the legacy of a seventeen-year tradition” (331). By having historical and contextual analysis integrated with close reading of some individual cases, Siyuan Liu’s study makes a unique and significant contribution to explaining why the reform had to take place, how it progressed, and what impact it had made both inside and outside the circle of traditional theatre. The xiqu reform is widely known for its policy and practice of gairen, gaixi, gaizhi (reforming practitioners, repertoire, and organizational structure), which constitutes the underlining structure throughout the chapters in Siyuan Liu’s monograph. The first two chapters deal with the censorship of content and purification of theatricality in performance, both of which have direct impact on the training and performance of actors and actresses, especially when so few traditional plays were allowed to be staged. The revision of plays, as discussed in chapter 3, is mainly subject to political ideology, but it is also manipulated under certain conditions to promote cultural exchanges with the outside world for the sake of boosting the image of a new socialist China. While jingju has so far been the major concern, the following two chapters address important issues in reforming various regional genres of xiqu and the so-called “outdated” style of performance, namely scenario plays. In the final chapter, the difficult and highly controversial process of transition from star-centered troupes to state-owned companies is under close scrutiny. It is worth pointing out that the three aspects of xiqu reform are not separate but rather complementary and supplementary to each other. Fundamentally, it is the xiqu practitioners that are the main target of reform; therefore, what they experience during the reform period turns out to be most intriguing and demands a great deal of critical attention. While embedded within a broad and comprehensive scope, each chapter of the book is devoted to careful analysis of a couple of representative examples, which exhibits a distinctive feature of uniting different perspectives, heterogeneous but mutually reinforcing. From a historical perspective, the xiqu reform is set against the traditions of Chinese theatre in feudal China, under the New Cultural [End Page 346] Movement in the early Republican era, and in the liberated areas under the governance of CCP in the 1930s and 1940s. In particular, the so-called “Yan’an paradigm,” which advocated the notion that literature and arts should serve the great mass of the proletariat, was adopted and even strengthened as the dominant ideology for reforming xiqu after new China was founded. Nevertheless, the policies concerning xiqu reform during the seventeen years underwent significant shifts due to that the implementation of policies was oftentimes unsatisfactory, resulting in some extremely radical measures and wrong decisions. For the clarity of historical analysis, some important events are highlighted, especially those in relation to major policy-making, the creation process of representative plays and their performances. For readers informed about the new development in event theories by Deleuze and Žižek, this approach is especially effective and persuasive as it is conducive to discussions on the emergence, uncertainties, and performative effects in carrying out the xiqu reform. From a comparative perspective, the xiqu reform was not an isolated phenomenon, exclusively limited to China, but rather closely related to theatre history in other parts of the world. First, the reform of Chinese theatre since the beginning of the 20th century, which...