Divergent effects of initial ventilation with delayed cord clamping on systemic and pulmonary arterial flows in the birth transition of preterm lambs

Joseph J. Smolich,Kelly R. Kenna

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1113/JP282934

2022-04-29

Journal of Physiology

Abstract:Key points A current view that delayed cord clamping (DCC) results in greater haemodynamic stability at birth than immediate cord clamping (ICC) is based on comparison of DCC versus ICC with an asphyxial (∼2min) cord clamp‐to‐ventilation (CC‐V) interval Recent data suggest that relatively minor perinatal differences in heart rate and blood pressure fluctuations exist between DCC and ICC with a non‐asphyxial (<45s) CC‐V interval, but how central arterial blood flow effects of DCC compare with those of non‐asphyxial ICC is unknown Anaesthetized preterm fetal lambs instrumented with central arterial flow probes underwent initial ventilation for ∼90s before DCC at birth, or ICC for ∼40s before ventilation Compared to non‐asphyxial ICC, initial ventilation with DCC redistributed central blood flows, resulting in lower systemic, but not pulmonary, arterial flows during this period of transition This flow redistribution was transitory, however, with systemic arterial flows similar between DCC and non‐asphyxial ICC within minutes after birth A current view that delayed cord clamping (DCC) results in greater haemodynamic stability at birth than immediate cord clamping (ICC) is based on comparison of DCC versus ICC followed by an asphyxial (∼2min) cord clamp‐to‐ventilation (CC‐V) interval. More recent data suggest that relatively minor perinatal differences in heart rate and blood pressure fluctuations exist between DCC and ICC with a non‐asphyxial (<45s) CC‐V interval, but it is unknown how ventricular output and central arterial blood flow effects of DCC compare with those of non‐asphyxial ICC. Anaesthetized preterm fetal lambs instrumented with flow probes on major central arteries were ventilated for 97(7)s (mean(SD)) before DCC at birth (n = 10), or underwent ICC 40(6)s before ventilation (n = 10). Compared to ICC, initial ventilation and DCC was accompanied by 1) redistribution of a similar level of ascending aortic flow away from cephalic arteries and towards the aortic isthmus after ventilation; 2) a lower right ventricular output after cord clamping that was redistributed towards the lungs, thereby maintaining the absolute contribution of this output to a similar increase in pulmonary arterial flow after birth; 3) a lower descending thoracic aortic flow after birth, related to a more rapid decline in phasic right‐to‐left ductal flow only partially offset by increased aortic isthmus flow. However, systemic arterial flows were similar between DCC and non‐asphyxial ICC within 5 minutes after birth. These findings suggest that compared to non‐asphyxial ICC, initial ventilation with DCC transiently redistributed central arterial flows, resulting in lower perinatal systemic arterial, but not pulmonary arterial, flows. figure legend In the initial minutes after birth following ventilation of the lungs with subsequent delayed clamping of the umbilical cord (DCC) ∼90 s later, the output of the left heart into the aortic trunk (AoT) rises, but this flow is also redistributed away from the brachiocephalic trunk (BCT), which supplies upper body organs such as the brain, and towards the aortic isthmus (AI) which, via the descending thoracic aorta (DTA), contributes to perfusion of lower body organs such as the kidneys. On the other hand, the output of the right heart into the pulmonary trunk (PT) falls, with an increased distribution of this flow into the pulmonary arteries (PA) increasing perfusion of the lungs, but a lesser distribution via the ductus arteriosus (Duct) leading to a fall in DTA blood flow. How the pattern of these blood flow changes with DCC (direction of change shown in red arrows) compares with those of immediate clamping of the umbilical cord followed by a ∼40 s non‐asphyxial interval prior to the start of ventilation, is shown in blue symbols. X denotes loss of the placenta from the fetal circulation after umbilical cord clamping. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved