The Pain Descriptors Used by Individuals with Musculoskeletal Pain from Northern India
Priyanka Siwach,Mark Jensen,Bhawna Verma
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/jpr.s457925
IF: 2.8319
2024-10-04
Journal of Pain Research
Abstract:Priyanka Siwach, 1 Mark P Jensen, 2 Bhawna Verma 1 1 College of Physiotherapy, Pandit Bhagwat Dayal Sharma University of Health Sciences, Rohtak, India; 2 Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA Correspondence: Mark P Jensen, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Box 359612, 325 Ninth Avenue, Seattle, WA, 98104-2499, USA, Email Background: Chronic pain is a common health problem worldwide that results in significant costs to society and has negative impacts on the individuals with chronic pain. In order to study and treat pain, valid and reliable pain assessment is necessary, including assessment of pain quality. However, all of the most commonly used measures of pain quality were developed in Western countries. Evidence has shown that some of these measures are not content valid for use in non-Western countries. Moreover, it remains unclear which pain descriptors are universal across people from different countries who speak different languages, and which are specific to individuals from a particular country or even from a particular region within one country. Aim: The current study sought to: (1) identify the number and frequency of words used by native speakers of Hindi in northern India to describe their pain; (2) compare the rates of descriptor use in these individuals with samples of individuals from Nepal and the USA; and (3) investigate the content validity of the most commonly used pain quality measures for measuring pain in this Hindi-speaking population. Methods: Two hundred and forty individuals with chronic musculoskeletal pain who speak and understand Hindi were asked to describe their pain. Results: The results showed overlap as well as differences in the words used to describe pain with samples of individuals with pain from other countries. Moreover, none of the pain quality measures examined were found to be content valid in the Hindi-speaking sample, suggesting that these measures need to be adapted to assess pain quality in this population. Conclusion: The study findings confirm the conclusion that pain quality measures developed in one country or in one pain population are not necessarily valid for assessing pain quality in a population from another country. The findings also suggest the possibility that a measure could be developed which would allow for more valid assessment of pain quality in individuals with pain from different countries. Keywords: pain quality, descriptors, content validity, chronic pain, musculoskeletal pain, meaning, language Chronic pain is a common health problem worldwide that results in significant costs to society and has negative impacts on individuals with chronic pain and their families. For example, in the UK, 13% to 50% adults have been reported to have chronic pain, depending on how it is defined. 1 In India, the prevalence of chronic pain has been estimated to be 19% in the adult population. 2 Moreover, as a developing country, India has limited resources and many people with chronic pain in India pain rely on government-run clinics for treatment. As a result, the negative impact of chronic pain on the economy in India may be even greater than that of other countries with more resources. Pain is a private experience that is not directly measurable by a laboratory test. Because pain is neither completely reducible to, nor separable from, its behavioral expressions, 3,4 knowing whether or not another person is experiencing pain and it quality requires valid and reliable self-report measures. This includes measures of pain quality. Among the most commonly used measures of pain quality are the two revised short forms of the McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ, SF-MPQ-2), 5,6 the original and revised Pain Quality Assessment Scale (PQAS, PQAS-R), 7 the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI), 8 and the Neuropathic Pain Scale (NPS). 9 Although each of these measures assesses a variety of pain quality domains, the currently available evidence – conducted in samples of individuals with fibromyalgia, low back pain, and headache – provides the most support for the content validity for the PQAS-R. 7 Given that pain does not have the same meaning for all people, 10 and is shaped by an individual's learning, history, and culture, 11 measures of pain quality developed in Western countries may not be valid or appropriate for use in non-Western countries. Consistent with this idea, prior research indicates that people from non-Western countries describe pain differently than people from Western countries. For example, in Nepal, people use -Abstract Truncated-
clinical neurology