Immune‐related adverse events of a PD‐L1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy versus a PD‐L1 inhibitor alone in first‐line treatment for advanced non–small cell lung cancer: A meta‐analysis of randomized control trials
Manting Wang,Hengrui Liang,Wei Wang,Shen Zhao,Xiuyu Cai,Yi Zhao,Caichen Li,Bo Cheng,Shan Xiong,Jianfu Li,Jianxing He,Wenhua Liang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.33270
IF: 6.9209
2020-10-29
Cancer
Abstract:<section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Background</h3><p>The addition of chemotherapy to a programmed death 1/programmed death ligand 1 (PD‐(L)1) inhibitor is a more effective option as a first‐line treatment for advanced non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). It might also inhibit an overactive immune response and thereby reduce immune‐related adverse events (irAEs). This meta‐analysis assessed the rate of irAEs with a PD‐(L)1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy (I+C) versus a PD‐(L)1 inhibitor alone (I) and evaluated the indirect relative risk (RR) of I+C versus I.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Methods</h3><p>The protocol of this study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42020139923). The pooled rates of irAEs at different grades were calculated by a single‐arm meta‐analysis weighted by sample size, and RRs were determined by direct meta‐analysis and indirect treatment comparison.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Results</h3><p>Overall, I+C had a lower rate of grade 3 or higher irAEs than I (7.1% vs 10.6%; indirect RR, 0.516; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.291‐0.916), although irAEs of any grade were similar. The rate of pneumonitis with I+C was lower than the rate with I for any grade (5.9% vs 7.1%; indirect RR, 0.217; 95% CI, 0.080‐0.588) and for grade 3 or higher. In the endocrine system, I+C was associated with a lower overall ratein comparison with I (16.1% vs 20.1%; indirect RR, 0.260; 95% CI, 0.120‐0.564), whereas irAEs of the digestive system were similar with I+C and I. In other systems, I+C decreased the rate of skin reactions, including rash, in comparison with I (10.4% vs 12.9%; indirect RR, 0.474; 95% CI, 0.299‐0.751). The rate of grade 3 or higher skin reactions (excluding rash) also decreased with I+C versus I (1.1% vs 2.0%) with an indirect RR of 0.158 (95% CI, 0.032‐0.765), whereas other included irAEs were similar.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Conclusions</h3><p>In comparison with a PD‐(L)1 inhibitor alone, a combination with chemotherapy for the first‐line treatment of NSCLC decreased the rates of most irAEs, such as pneumonitis and endocrine and skin reactions, and the overall rate.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Lay Summary</h3><ul class="unordered-list"><li>In the first‐line treatment of advanced non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the addition of chemotherapy to a programmed death 1/programmed death ligand 1 (PD‐(L)1) inhibitor is a more effective option.</li><li>Adding chemotherapy might reduce immune‐related adverse events (irAEs). Thus, this article assesses the rate of irAEs with a PD‐(L)1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy (I+C) in comparison with a PD‐(L)1 inhibitor alone (I) and evaluates the indirect relative risk (RR) with I+C versus I.</li><li>The key finding is that in comparison with a PD‐(L)1 inhibitor alone, a combination with chemotherapy for the first‐line treatment of NSCLC decreases the rates of most irAEs, such as pneumonitis and endocrine and skin reactions, and the overall rate.</li></ul></section>
oncology