Splenic Artery Embolization in Conservative Management of Blunt Splenic Injury Graded by 2018 AAST-OIS: Results from a Hospital in Vietnam
Van Thang Nguyen,Hong Duc Pham,Van Phan Nguyen Thanh,Thanh Dung Le
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S409267
IF: 2.145
2023-05-09
International Journal of General Medicine
Abstract:Van Thang Nguyen, 1, 2, &ast Hong Duc Pham, 2, 3, &ast Van Phan Nguyen Thanh, 4 Thanh Dung Le 5, 6 1 Radiology Department, Hai Duong Medical Technical University, Hai Duong, Vietnam; 2 Radiology Department, Hanoi Medical University, Hanoi, Vietnam; 3 Radiology Department, Saint Paul Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam; 4 Department of Biochemistry, Pham Ngoc Thach University of Medicine, Ho Chi Minh city, Vietnam; 5 Radiology Department, Viet Duc University Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam; 6 Department of Radiology, VNU University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hanoi, Vietnam &astThese authors contributed equally to this work Correspondence: Van Phan Nguyen Thanh, Department of biochemistry, Pham Ngoc Thach University of Medicine, 2 Duong Quang Trung Street, Ho Chi Minh city, 700000, Vietnam, Tel +84919691770, Email Purpose: This study was conducted to evaluate the results of conservative management of blunt splenic trauma according to the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma-Organ Injury Scale (AAST-OIS) in 2018 by embolization. Methods: This observational study included 50 patients (42 men and 8 women) with splenic injury who underwent multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) and embolization. Results: According to the 2018 AAST-OIS, 27 cases had higher grades than they did according to the 1994 AAST-OIS. The grades of two cases of grade II increased to grade IV; those of 15 cases of grade III increased to grade IV; and four cases of grade IV increased to grade V. As a result, all patients underwent successful splenic embolization and were stable at discharge. No patients required re-embolization or conversion to splenectomy. The mean hospital stay was 11.8± 7 days (range, 6– 44 days), with no difference in length of hospital stay among grades of splenic injury (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Compared with the AAST-OIS 1994, the AAST-OIS 2018 classification is useful in making embolization decisions, regardless of the degree of blunt splenic injury with vascular lacerations visible on MDCT. Keywords: blunt splenic trauma, multidetector computed tomography, MDCT, splenic embolization In the past two decades, conservative treatment of blunt splenic injury has increasingly been prioritized to prevent unnecessary laparotomy, maximize the rate of splenic preservation, and reduce the length of hospital stay. 1 Splenic artery embolization with materials, such as gelatin sponge, coil, and embozene particles, has proven its worth as an adjunct to nonsurgical management, and it is preferred to splenectomy whenever possible. 1 According to recent studies, the success of this method in hemodynamically stable patients is 88.1–100%. 2,3 However, most researchers still use the results of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma-Organ Injury Scale (AAST-OIS)-1994 classification to guide indication for surgical intervention. Assessment of the role of the 2018 AAST-OIS in blunt splenic injury grading has been studied by researchers in other countries. 3,4 Especially, no studies applying the 2018 AAST-OIS classification have been conducted in Vietnam. Therefore, the aim of our study was to evaluate the results of embolization in the conservative management of blunt splenic injury using the 2018 AAST-OIS. Fifty patients with blunt splenic injuries admitted to Saint Paul Hospital from April 2017 to June 2022 (patients from April 2017 to February 2022 were retrospectively assessed, whereas those admitted from March 2022 to June 2022 were prospectively evaluated) underwent embolization as conservative treatment. All patients received two-pass dual (arterial and portal venous) phase computed tomography (CT), with grades III–V according to the AAST-OIS 2018 classification and vascular injury (active bleeding, pseudoaneurysm, or arteriovenous fistulas) findings. Patients with grades I and II or history of injury >30 days before time of admission were excluded. Evaluations were performed using Siemens Somatom 32 slice CT scanners. Primary image interpretation was performed in the axial plane, and images acquired had 3–5 mm thickness, 0.65–1.2 pitch, 100–120 kilovolts, 350 mm FOV, and sagittal and coronal reformatted in 2 mm. Xenetic 300 iodinated contrast was administered intravenously at 3–5 mL/s, 1.5 mL/kg. The arterial, portal venous, and delayed phases (if needed) were acquired in about 25–35 seconds, 60–70 seconds, and 3–5 minutes, respectively, after the start of intravenous contrast injection. The following were the various MDCT findings. (1) Splenic lacerations had a linear/branching shape, low-attenuating defects, and irregular margin -Abstract Truncated-
medicine, general & internal