Abstract:Terrestrial ecosystems currently sequester about one third of anthropogenic CO2 emissions each year, an important ecosystem service that dampens climate change. The future fate of this net uptake of CO2 by land based ecosystems is highly uncertain. Most ecosystem models used to predict the future terrestrial carbon cycle share a common architecture, whereby carbon that enters the system as net primary production (NPP) is distributed to plant compartments, transferred to litter and soil through vegetation turnover and then re-emitted to the atmosphere in conjunction with soil decomposition. However, while all models represent the processes of NPP and soil decomposition, they vary greatly in their representations of vegetation turnover and the associated processes governing mortality, disturbance and biome shifts. Here we used a detailed second generation dynamic global vegetation model with advanced representation of vegetation growth and mortality, and the associated turnover. We apply an emulator that describes the carbon flows and pools exactly as in simulations with the full model. The emulator simulates ecosystem dynamics in response to 13 different climate or Earth system model simulations from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 ensemble under RCP8.5 radiative forcing. By exchanging carbon cycle processes between these 13 simulations we quantified the relative roles of three main driving processes of the carbon cycle; (I) NPP, (II) vegetation dynamics and turnover and (III) soil decomposition, in terms of their contribution to future carbon (C) uptake uncertainties among the ensemble of climate change scenarios. We found that NPP, vegetation turnover (including structural shifts, wild fires and mortality) and soil decomposition rates explained 49%, 17% and 33%, respectively, of uncertainties in modelled global C-uptake. Uncertainty due to vegetation turnover was further partitioned into stand-clearing disturbances (16%), wild fires (0%), stand dynamics (7%), reproduction (10%) and biome shifts (67%) globally. We conclude that while NPP and soil decomposition rates jointly account for 83% of future climate induced C-uptake uncertainties, vegetation turnover and structure, dominated by biome shifts, represent a significant fraction globally and regionally (tropical forests: 40%), strongly motivating their representation and analysis in future C-cycle studies.

Representing and Understanding the Carbon Cycle Using the Theory of Compartmental Dynamical Systems

Towards better representations of carbon allocation in vegetation: a conceptual framework and mathematical tool

Transient Dynamics of Terrestrial Carbon Storage: Mathematical Foundation and Its Applications

Transient Dynamics of Terrestrial Carbon Storage: Mathematical Foundation and Numeric Examples

A Model Investigation of Vegetation-Atmosphere Interactions on a Millennial Timescale

Simulation of Terrestrial Carbon Equilibrium State by Using a Detachable Carbon Cycle Scheme

A general mathematical framework for representing soil organic matter dynamics

What Models Tell Us About the Evolution of Carbon Sources and Sinks over the Phanerozoic

A big-microsite framework for soil carbon modeling

Importance of Vegetation Dynamics for Future Terrestrial Carbon Cycling

A Dynamic Disequilibrium Hypothesis for Terrestrial Carbon Cycle

Coupling scales in process‐based soil organic carbon modeling including dynamic aggregation

Explore the Earth System Climate Change:Simulation and Modeling (Part I)

A simulation study for the global carbon cycle, including man's impact on the biosphere

[Modeling of Carbon Cycling in Terrestrial Ecosystem: a Review].

Comparative analysis of carbon cycle models via kinetic representations

A Carbon-Cycle Based Stochastic Cellular Automata Climate Model

Two sub-annual timescales and coupling modes for terrestrial water and carbon cycles

Challenges of Achieving Efficient Simulations Through Model Abstraction

Climate, ecosystems, and planetary futures: The challenge to predict life in Earth system models

Carbon Dynamics and Land-Use Choices: Building a Regional-Scale Multidisciplinary Model