Assessing the influence of land use, agricultural, industrialization, CO2 emissions, and energy intensity on cereal production
Prince Dorian Rivel Bambi,Jean Baptiste Bernard Pea-Assounga
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122612
2024-09-23
Abstract:In light of the growing global demand for food and the urgent need to address environmental challenges, it is essential to understand the factors that influence cereal production. This research set out to examine the intricate relationships between land use practices, agricultural methods, industrialization, energy intensity, carbon emissions, urban population growth, gross domestic savings, and cereal production across fifteen key cereal-producing states in the Americas. The study employs a Panel VAR/GMM model with data spanning from 2000 to 2021. The findings indicate that the lag of all variables exerts a strong, positive, and statistically significant effect on their current values. However, the lag of cereal production on other variables reveals a mixed and weaker effect, with cereal production showing a slight negative impact on land use and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. Conversely, the lag of land use positively influences cereal production, underscoring land management's crucial role. Meanwhile, the lag of agricultural practices, while mostly insignificant on other variables including cereal production, negatively affects urban population growth, suggesting that agricultural activities may slow urbanization. Additionally, industrialization has no significant effect on cereal production, except a weak negative influence on CO2 emissions and energy intensity. In contrast, Carbon dioxide emissions, exhibit a significant negative effect on cereal production, highlighting their detrimental impact on agricultural output. Moreover, the lag of energy intensity negatively affects CO2 emissions, suggesting more efficient energy use could help reduce emissions. Meanwhile, Urban population growth also has a significant negative impact on cereal production, indicating that urbanization may harm food security. The effect of gross domestic savings is generally weak and statistically insignificant across variables, though it shows some negative influence on both cereal production and urban population growth. Lastly, Granger causality tests show significant bidirectional causality between land use and cereal production, as well as between CO2 emissions and cereal production. The stability tests indicate that the model remains stable with impulse response functions. Based on these findings, the study offers practical policy implications, acknowledges limitations, and suggests future research directions, providing valuable insights for balancing agricultural productivity, environmental sustainability, and urban development.