Clustering on longitudinal quality‐of‐life measurements using growth mixture models for clinical prognosis: Implementation on CCTG/AGITG CO.20 trial

Jiahui Zhang,Weili Kong,Pingzhao Hu,Derek Jonker,Malcolm Moore,Jolie Ringash,Jeremy Shapiro,John Zalcberg,John Simes,Dongsheng Tu,Chris J. O'Callaghan,Geoffrey Liu,Wei Xu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.5341
IF: 4.711
2022-10-26
Cancer Medicine
Abstract:Introduction Analyzing longitudinal cancer quality‐of‐life (QoL) measurements and their impact on clinical outcomes may improve our understanding of patient trajectories during systemic therapy. We applied an unsupervised growth mixture modeling (GMM) approach to identify unobserved subpopulations ("patient clusters") in the CO.20 clinical trial longitudinal QoL data. Classes were then evaluated for differences in clinico‐epidemiologic characteristics and overall survival (OS). Methods and Materials In CO.20, 750 chemotherapy‐refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) patients were randomized to receive Brivanib+Cetuximab (n = 376, experimental arm) versus Cetuximab+Placebo (n = 374, standard arm) for 16 weeks. EORTC‐QLQ‐C30 QoL summary scores were calculated for each patient at seven time points, and GMM was applied to identify patient clusters (termed "classes"). Log‐rank/Kaplan–Meier and multivariable Cox regression analyses were conducted to analyze the survival performance between classes. Cox analyses were used to explore the relationship between baseline QoL, individual slope, and the quadratic terms from the GMM output with OS. Results In univariable analysis, the linear mixed effect model (LMM) identified sex and ECOG Performance Status as strongly associated with the longitudinal QoL score (p
oncology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?